| |
1998 |
Pts |
1999 |
Pts |
2000 |
Pts |
2001 |
Pts |
2002 |
Pts |
| 1 |
SEA |
173 |
STL |
158 |
DEN |
144 |
CLE |
118 |
TB |
122 |
| 2 |
NO |
140 |
KC |
150 |
TB |
140 |
NE |
117 |
PHI |
119 |
| 3 |
ATL |
124 |
JAX |
129 |
NO |
131 |
CHI |
117 |
GB |
113 |
| 4 |
OAK |
112 |
TEN |
127 |
OAK |
127 |
GB |
115 |
NO |
113 |
| 5 |
GB |
112 |
PHI |
122 |
TEN |
121 |
PIT |
114 |
CAR |
112 |
| 6 |
MIN |
109 |
DET |
114 |
MIA |
109 |
STL |
113 |
OAK |
110 |
| 7 |
MIA |
105 |
BAL |
109 |
PHI |
105 |
SD |
109 |
ATL |
105 |
| 8 |
NYG |
104 |
WAS |
108 |
BAL |
103 |
NYJ |
108 |
BAL |
101 |
| 9 |
TB |
103 |
DAL |
107 |
STL |
100 |
PHI |
107 |
PIT |
99 |
| 10 |
PIT |
101 |
MIN |
101 |
PIT |
100 |
TB |
103 |
NE |
99 |
| 11 |
BAL |
98 |
DEN |
98 |
KC |
98 |
MIA |
102 |
DET |
94 |
| 12 |
SF |
96 |
NE |
97 |
CAR |
96 |
OAK |
95 |
SD |
93 |
| 13 |
DAL |
95 |
GB |
96 |
SEA |
95 |
CAR |
92 |
TEN |
93 |
| 14 |
CAR |
95 |
SEA |
93 |
SD |
93 |
SEA |
92 |
HOU |
92 |
| 15 |
DEN |
95 |
NO |
91 |
DET |
88 |
NO |
91 |
MIA |
88 |
| 16 |
CHI |
92 |
OAK |
90 |
NYJ |
87 |
IND |
89 |
KC |
88 |
| 17 |
STL |
90 |
NYJ |
87 |
ATL |
87 |
JAX |
89 |
SEA |
87 |
| 18 |
NYJ |
89 |
IND |
86 |
IND |
87 |
CIN |
88 |
DAL |
85 |
| 19 |
BUF |
86 |
TB |
86 |
BUF |
83 |
DEN |
88 |
WAS |
85 |
| 20 |
NE |
84 |
CIN |
86 |
NYG |
82 |
BAL |
87 |
DEN |
83 |
| 21 |
ARI |
84 |
SF |
84 |
CHI |
80 |
NYG |
87 |
CLE |
76 |
| 22 |
JAX |
84 |
SD |
82 |
GB |
80 |
SF |
85 |
STL |
76 |
| 23 |
DET |
82 |
CHI |
82 |
WAS |
80 |
TEN |
81 |
NYJ |
76 |
| 24 |
KC |
81 |
PIT |
81 |
CLE |
74 |
DET |
77 |
NYG |
74 |
| Rank |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
| 1 |
173 |
158 |
144 |
118 |
122 |
| 2 |
140 |
150 |
140 |
117 |
119 |
| 3 |
124 |
129 |
131 |
117 |
113 |
| 4 |
112 |
127 |
127 |
115 |
113 |
| 5 |
112 |
122 |
121 |
114 |
112 |
| 6 |
109 |
114 |
109 |
113 |
110 |
| Top 6 |
770 |
800 |
772 |
694 |
689 |
| 7 |
105 |
109 |
105 |
109 |
105 |
| 8 |
104 |
108 |
103 |
108 |
101 |
| 9 |
103 |
107 |
100 |
107 |
99 |
| 10 |
101 |
101 |
100 |
103 |
99 |
| 11 |
98 |
98 |
98 |
102 |
94 |
| 12 |
96 |
97 |
96 |
95 |
93 |
| 7 - 12 |
607 |
620 |
602 |
624 |
591 |
| 13 |
95 |
96 |
95 |
92 |
93 |
| 14 |
95 |
93 |
93 |
92 |
92 |
| 15 |
95 |
91 |
88 |
91 |
88 |
| 16 |
92 |
90 |
87 |
89 |
88 |
| 17 |
90 |
87 |
87 |
89 |
87 |
| 18 |
89 |
86 |
87 |
88 |
85 |
| 19 |
86 |
86 |
83 |
88 |
85 |
| 20 |
84 |
86 |
82 |
87 |
83 |
| 21 |
84 |
84 |
80 |
87 |
76 |
| 22 |
84 |
82 |
80 |
85 |
76 |
| 23 |
82 |
82 |
80 |
81 |
76 |
| 24 |
81 |
81 |
74 |
77 |
74 |
| 13-24 |
1057 |
1044 |
1016 |
1046 |
1003 |
| Total |
2338 |
2464 |
2390 |
2364 |
2283 |
Defenses are scored
differently in most fantasy leagues and those differences in scoring
can be very significant. Unlike offensive players which vary
on yardage and
touchdown points, defensive scoring in your league can include many things
besides the safeties, touchdowns, sacks and turnovers the
above list considered.
Negative points for yardage allowed or touchdowns allowed tremendously
impacts how defenses fall into rankings and is becoming more
popular.
Still, this level of analysis does offer a valuable insight
into the nature of fantasy defenses. Over the past five
seasons, defenses have scored less though most of that
is attributable to the top two or three teams from the
earlier years not being matched in recent years. After
the top three or four defenses, each season has been fairly
similar overall.
After those top six defenses, there is less than a five
percent difference from year to year in the next best 18 defenses.
The trend line for each season almost mirrors each other after
the top six defenses. Simply said, defenses wait until the
later rounds in most drafts because the reality is that getting
the #5 defense or the #12 defense usually ends up about one
point per game difference. Makes a good case for changing
standard performance for defenses to make bigger point awards
or include negative points.
But how well can the past season predict the future one
for defenses? It is an entire squad of players, much more
likely to maintain their level from season to season than
an individual player. Or so it would seem.
The reality is actually rather different than theory. The
theory that defenses repeat their performances is as reasonable
as the childhood theory that bed sheets make good parachutes.
However, in application both tend to leave you smarting for
the experience.
| The Next Year a Top 6 became: |
| |
98 |
99 |
00 |
01 |
Avg |
| Top 6 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0.5 |
| 7 - 12 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2.3 |
| 13 - 24 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2.3 |
| Duds |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
Remember that the last five years has seen only the very
top defenses yield any competitive advantage. And yet relying
on a historical view that uses just the last season has
resulted in some disappointing draft picks. The best six
defenses of the prior year have only repeated as a top
six defense the next year twice in the past four years!
Not one of the top three defenses has repeated as a top
three the next year! And I hate using exclamation points!
Selecting a Top six defense from the prior season has resulted
in only about a third of them even making it back to being
a Top 12 defense (AKA starting fantasy defense). The only
consistency in a defense from one year to the next is that
the best ones are almost locks not to repeat. Their biggest
advantage is looking like you scored some coup in your draft
when you take the hot defense from the prior season.
This would indicate that the group of TB, PHI, GB, NO, CAR
and OAK are very likely to fall this season in fantasy points
and the trend says they all will fall.
| The Next Year 7th to 12th became: |
| |
98 |
99 |
00 |
01 |
Avg |
| Top 6 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
| 7 - 12 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1.5 |
| 13 - 24 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1.5 |
| Duds |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
Taking a defense that was ranked 7th to 12th best the prior
season has been actually better than a previous Top 6 defense
for getting a top spot, but normally only one of the six actually
rises, the majority of them will fall. Do you feel lucky,
punk? Well? Do you? Out of ATL, BAL, PIT, NE, DET and SD,
which one can rise up higher into the Top 6?
The bottom line to defenses as shown by the past five years
is that not only is there no such thing as a "lock"
the next year, but that your chances actually improve by not
taking a top defense the previous season. Under the scoring
used, there is not a lot of difference between defensive scoring
for a season anyway, and predicting who will be on top the
next season is made even harder by the absence of past history
as a key. In short, normal scoring for defenses that only
uses sacks, safeties, turnovers and touchdowns results in
wildly fluctuating performances from season to season.
Let me repeat again the most important fact - overall,
defenses do not tend to separate themselves enough to make
them worthy of an early pick (using standard defensive
scoring). Scoring taken at a season level is very smoothly
descending in a gentle curve. Having the best defense each
season versus the worst starting defense (ranked 12th)
has not meant more than one or two extra points a week.
Compare that to the ten to fifteen point difference between
first and twelfth ranked runningbacks for example.
This suggests one main theory for defenses that can be
considered reasonable. Don't squander a high pick on a
defense when there are still sleeper receivers, tight ends
or runningbacks to take. Try to get two "middle of
the pack" defenses instead of grabbing an early "hot
team" and then waiting until the end to back them
up. Chances are very good that your second defenses will
be needed for more than a bye week filler and two middle
of the road defenses can be mixed and matched against the
most attractive weekly opponent.
|