| |
1998 |
Pts |
1999 |
Pts |
2000 |
Pts |
2001 |
Pts |
2002 |
Pts |
| 1 |
G Anderson |
164 |
M Vanderjagt |
145 |
M Stover |
135 |
J Wilkins |
127 |
J Feely |
138 |
| 2 |
S Christie |
140 |
O Mare |
144 |
R Longwell |
131 |
M Vanderjagt |
125 |
D Akers |
133 |
| 3 |
A Del Greco |
136 |
T Peterson |
134 |
J Nedney |
126 |
J Elam |
124 |
J Carney |
130 |
| 4 |
R Longwell |
128 |
M Hollis |
130 |
M Gramatica |
126 |
K Brown |
124 |
R Longwell |
128 |
| 5 |
J Elam |
127 |
J Wilkins |
124 |
D Akers |
121 |
M Stover |
115 |
M Gramatica |
128 |
| 6 |
Cunningham |
127 |
J Elam |
116 |
M Vanderjagt |
121 |
D Akers |
115 |
S Janikowski |
128 |
| 7 |
A Vinatieri |
125 |
M Stover |
116 |
A Del Greco |
118 |
J Feely |
115 |
J Elam |
120 |
| 8 |
M Andersen |
120 |
J Carney |
115 |
O Mare |
117 |
J Carney |
113 |
M Andersen |
117 |
| 9 |
J Hall |
120 |
B Conway |
115 |
S Janikowski |
112 |
A Vinatieri |
113 |
A Vinatieri |
117 |
| 10 |
Stoyanovich |
115 |
R Longwell |
113 |
G Anderson |
111 |
P Edinger |
112 |
M Hollis |
115 |
| 11 |
J Hanson |
114 |
J Hall |
108 |
S Christie |
109 |
S Janikowski |
111 |
O Mare |
114 |
| 12 |
M Hollis |
108 |
S Christie |
108 |
K Brown |
107 |
T Peterson |
108 |
J Nedney |
111 |
| 13 |
Vanderjagt |
104 |
P Stoyanovich |
108 |
D Brien |
106 |
J Hall |
104 |
M Bryant |
108 |
| 14 |
W Richey |
103 |
A Vinatieri |
107 |
A Vinatieri |
106 |
R Longwell |
104 |
J Hall |
107 |
| 15 |
N Johnson |
99 |
M Gramatica |
106 |
M Hollis |
105 |
J Cortez |
101 |
R Lindell |
107 |
| 16 |
O Mare |
99 |
J Hanson |
106 |
J Elam |
103 |
B Conway |
100 |
J Cortez |
103 |
| 17 |
T Peterson |
98 |
A Del Greco |
106 |
T Seder |
102 |
M Andersen |
98 |
M Vanderjagt |
103 |
| 18 |
J Carney |
97 |
K Brown |
105 |
J Hanson |
101 |
M Gramatica |
97 |
J Hanson |
100 |
| 19 |
B Daluiso |
95 |
G Anderson |
103 |
M Andersen |
98 |
O Mare |
96 |
P Dawson |
100 |
| 20 |
M Husted |
92 |
J Kasay |
99 |
J Hall |
93 |
P Dawson |
95 |
M Stover |
96 |
| 21 |
J Kasay |
92 |
W Richey |
93 |
J Wilkins |
89 |
J Nedney |
94 |
P Edinger |
95 |
| 22 |
D Brien |
91 |
D Brien |
92 |
W Richey |
88 |
R Lindell |
93 |
J Wilkins |
94 |
| 23 |
J Jaeger |
90 |
M Husted |
90 |
B Daluiso |
85 |
J Kasay |
91 |
G Anderson |
90 |
| 24 |
M Stover |
87 |
Cunningham |
89 |
P Edinger |
84 |
W Richey |
89 |
S Christie |
89 |
| Rank |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
| 1 |
164 |
145 |
135 |
127 |
138 |
| 2 |
140 |
144 |
131 |
125 |
133 |
| 3 |
136 |
134 |
126 |
124 |
130 |
| 4 |
128 |
130 |
126 |
124 |
128 |
| 5 |
127 |
124 |
121 |
115 |
128 |
| 6 |
127 |
116 |
121 |
115 |
128 |
| Top 6 |
822 |
793 |
760 |
730 |
785 |
| 7 |
125 |
116 |
118 |
115 |
120 |
| 8 |
120 |
115 |
117 |
113 |
117 |
| 9 |
120 |
115 |
112 |
113 |
117 |
| 10 |
115 |
113 |
111 |
112 |
115 |
| 11 |
114 |
108 |
109 |
111 |
114 |
| 12 |
108 |
108 |
107 |
108 |
111 |
| 7 - 12 |
702 |
675 |
674 |
672 |
694 |
| 13 |
104 |
108 |
106 |
104 |
108 |
| 14 |
103 |
107 |
106 |
104 |
107 |
| 15 |
99 |
106 |
105 |
101 |
107 |
| 16 |
99 |
106 |
103 |
100 |
103 |
| 17 |
98 |
106 |
102 |
98 |
103 |
| 18 |
97 |
105 |
101 |
97 |
100 |
| 19 |
95 |
103 |
98 |
96 |
100 |
| 20 |
92 |
99 |
93 |
95 |
96 |
| 21 |
92 |
93 |
89 |
94 |
95 |
| 22 |
91 |
92 |
88 |
93 |
94 |
| 23 |
90 |
90 |
85 |
91 |
90 |
| 24 |
87 |
89 |
84 |
89 |
89 |
| 13-24 |
1147 |
1204 |
1160 |
1162 |
1192 |
| Total |
2671 |
2672 |
2594 |
2564 |
2671 |
Ah yes, those wonderful kickers.
Kickers had been showing a downward trend in scoring at the upper levels for
four years until last season had a mild increase to stop the trend. As shown
to the right, in most seasons the difference between the very best kicker and
the sixth overall kicker is typically about a dozen points over the course
of a season.
The difference between the best kicker and the 12th, or
last starting fantasy kicker is much more pronounced and
ends up about one or two points per game. It makes a difference,
albeit small, but having the difference makers is what
a championship team is all about.
Every team wants to have a 100 point kicker and last season
saw 19 different kickers reach the mark, a five year high.
There is depth, of sorts, but with no more than two points
per game separating the best from the 12th best indicates
either you find the top guy or play mix and match each
week - a big challenge for this position. As always, a
kicker's opportunity relies not on what he can do, but
how close the offense gets to the endzone before stalling.
In the world of short memories, the last season always weighs
heaviest in the minds of people ranking their kickers. However,
the top six kickers - those that made a difference for the
pick - only show one kicker repeating the feat the following
season. 2000 witnessed a record three remain consistently
high, but it is a safe bet that 2000 was the anomaly, not
a new trend.
If you remove Jason Elam and Mike Vanderjagt from the
equation, there was almost no kicker repeating the
| Top 6 kicker next year became: |
| |
98 |
99 |
00 |
01 |
| Top 6 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
| 7-12 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| 13-24 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
| Duds |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
next
year. Those of you that grabbed Vanderjagt last year
were taught that even he was not above a nosedive.
Those kickers that fell in the 7th to 12th rank the prior
season were actually a little better at reaching the top
six the following year than were those that had reached
it the prior year. Still, most seasons see these 7th to
12th kickers more likely fall the next year than rise,
though 2002 had a record three kickers (Feely, Carney and
Janikowski) rise up to the highest level after a solid
yet unspectacular season in 2001. What does this all mean?
| 6th to 12th kicker next year became: |
| |
98 |
99 |
00 |
01 |
| Top 6 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
| 7-12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 13-24 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Duds |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
Kickers are not worthless, but their value is exceedingly
difficult to determine based on prior factors. The best kickers
almost exclusively come from playoff-bound teams that are
scoring well. Kicker success is largely the product of the
offense. They have no plays to learn, no real chemistry to
create and no particular development is needed. They tee it
up and kick it straight and the main component of their value
is how often they get to do that. When selecting a kicker,
you are actually selecting an offense more than a person.
|