The
Huddle
WEEK 4
September 24, 2003
Season Ticket
|
|
| |
|
| San Diego vs Oakland |
Sun, Sep 28; 4 PM on CBS at Network
Associates Coliseum |
| |
San
Diego |
Rush
|
Catch
|
Pass |
| QB |
Drew
Brees |
10 |
0 |
190 |
| RB |
L.
Tomlinson |
110,1 |
40 |
0 |
| TE |
Justin
Pelle |
0 |
20 |
0 |
| WR |
David
Boston |
S |
S |
S |
| WR |
Eric
Parker |
0 |
60 |
0 |
| WR |
Kassim
Osgood |
0 |
40 |
0 |
| WR |
Tim
Dwight |
Q |
Q |
Q |
|
| |
Oakland |
Rush
|
Catch
|
Pass |
| QB |
Rich
Gannon |
0 |
0 |
220,2 |
| RB |
Tyrone
Wheatley |
30 |
0 |
0 |
| RB |
Charlie
Garner |
60 |
30 |
0 |
| RB |
Justin
Fargas |
30 |
0 |
0 |
| TE |
Doug
Jolley |
0 |
30,1 |
0 |
| WR |
Tim
Brown |
0 |
50 |
0 |
| WR |
Ronald
Curry |
0 |
20 |
0 |
| WR |
Jerry
Rice |
0 |
60,1 |
0 |
|
Game Prediction: SD 10, OAK 23
Update:
David Boston was suspended this week and will not play. Tim
Dwight has a sprained MCL and may not play which leaves Eric
Parker and Kassim Osgood as the most likely primary receivers
in this game for the Chargers. Based on the even worse look
of the offense, I am downgrading their numbers and total score.
Charlie Garner was not on the injury
report but did get a shot to his ribs last Monday that took
him out of that game. Now the Raiders are openly wondering
if a shift from their pas-heavy style of offense is needed
and within that an increased use of the running game and less
reliance on the pass. This game will be interesting to see
how that transpires or if it does but in light of that news
I am including Tyrone Wheatley in the projections and Zack
Crockett could again become viable as the goalline back as
he did in Denver on Monday.
The Chargers have become a standard of consistency this season
in a league that hates consistency. Problem is - they are
consistently bad and lose every game by two touchdowns.
While LaDainian Tomlinson is one of the most talented
runners in the NFL, it doesn't matter much when his team is
hopelessly behind by the fourth quarter every game. Currently
Tomlinson is 11th in rushing yardage this season, right behind
Stephen Davis who was on bye last week. Evidently Kansas City
only needed to get rid of Schottenheimer in order to get the
exact team he always wanted to build there. Tomlinson finally
crested the 100 yard mark last week with his 105 yard, 1 touchdown
game.
The situation in San Diego is not improving though it cannot
get much worse. Some people are questioning that Schottenheimer
is losing the team already and his weekly reports on their
improvement are starting to sound like the Iraqi information
minister has been writing his speeches. "Jamal Lewis
will run no more! He has been thrown back to his devil's den
and never more shall the infidels cross the line of scrimmage!"
Drew Brees comes off a 270 yard passing game against
the Ravens but he logged three interceptions instead of any
touchdowns. That leaves him with three touchdowns and six
interceptions on the year. David Boston is currently
between injuries right now and had six catches for 91 yards
last week. It is easy to tell which receiver is making the
most money by just watching where Brees is looking on each
passing play. Problem is that the defense does this too and
hence the three interceptions.
Last week's fantasy free agent darling Eric Parker
only had four catches for 40 yards and as he plays behind
David Boston, he has to wait until later in the game for the
multiple receiver sets book to be dusted off in order to see
much playing time. Tim Dwight (3-33) sprained his knee
and pending news on his MRI I am considering him out.
The Raiders come off a Monday night game where they proved,
conclusively, that all is not well in the land of spiked collars
and spitting linebackers. Last season, Oakland debuted an
offense that was a powerhouse and well beyond expectations
from the veteran crew. This season they are still the same
distance from expectations except now they are in the opposite
direction.
The Raiders have become predictable, evidenced by the fact
that one reason Gannon was having a tirade on the sideline
was because the defense was calling out what the play was
going to be before the ball was ever snapped.
Rich Gannon comes off a 14 of 29, 149 yard performance
against the Broncos and only trash time throws made the game
seem even remotely respectable. The only positive from the
game was that both Jerry Rice (4-61) and Tim Brown
(1-11) extended their streaks of consecutive games with a
receptions. In the case of Brown, it required five throws
in the second half to get that one catch.
The Broncos had evidently noticed what the rest of the world
knew by focusing their defense against Charlie Garner
and holding him to only four runs for nine yards and one catch
for a two yard loss. Garner left the game after the 0-21 first
quarter with bruised ribs so that Tyrone Wheatley could
run five times for 16 yards as the designated tackling dummy.
This week will pit two teams that are reeling from their
recent play and searching for answers that do not seem to
be coming. Both teams are starting to strain in the lockerroom
and only one team can get the much needed win.
Look for LaDainian Tomlinson to have a good showing
here as should David Boston if only in sheer volume
of passes. The Raiders will win the game because they are
still good enough to contend with the Chargers and Charlie
Garner should return to more productive ways against a
defense that runners love.
|
SD
|
OAK
|
2003 Averages
|
OAK
|
SD
|
|
Gains
|
Allows
|
QB's
|
Gains
|
Allows
|
|
218
|
257
|
Pass yards
|
184
|
191
|
|
1.0
|
1.7
|
Pass TDs
|
0.7
|
1.7
|
|
2.0
|
1
|
Interceptions
|
0.3
|
0.7
|
|
7
|
22
|
Rush yards
|
3
|
4
|
|
0.0
|
0.3
|
Rush TDs
|
0
|
0.0
|
|
----
|
-----
|
RB's
|
-----
|
----
|
|
80
|
107
|
Rush yards
|
66
|
153
|
|
0.3
|
0.7
|
Rush TDs
|
0.7
|
1.3
|
|
29
|
23
|
Receive yards
|
59
|
44
|
|
0.0
|
0
|
Receive TD's
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
|
----
|
-----
|
WR's
|
-----
|
----
|
|
151
|
185
|
Receive yards
|
94
|
102
|
|
0.7
|
1.3
|
Receive TD's
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
|
----
|
-----
|
TE's
|
-----
|
----
|
|
38
|
48
|
Receive yards
|
31
|
44
|
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
Receive TD's
|
0
|
1.0
|
|
----
|
-----
|
PK's
|
-----
|
----
|
|
1.0
|
2.3
|
Field Goals
|
2
|
2.0
|
|
1.3
|
2.7
|
Extra Points
|
1.7
|
3.3
|
|
----
|
-----
|
DEF/ST
|
-----
|
----
|
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
Fumbles
|
0.7
|
0.0
|
|
0.7
|
0.3
|
Interceptions
|
1
|
2.0
|
|
0.0
|
1.3
|
Touchdowns
|
0.3
|
0.0
|
|
1.7
|
1.7
|
Sacks
|
1.7
|
1.3
|
|
0.0
|
0
|
Safeties
|
0
|
0.0
|
|
|
Chargers (0-3) |
|
Score |
Opp. |
| 14-27 |
@KC |
| 13-37 |
DEN |
| 10-24 |
BAL |
| Week 4 |
@OAK |
| Week 5 |
@JAX |
| Week 6 |
BYE |
| Week 7 |
@CLE |
| Week 8 |
MIA |
| Week 9 |
@CHI |
| Week 10 |
MIN |
| Week 11 |
@DEN |
| Week 12 |
CIN |
| Week 13 |
KC |
| Week 14 |
@DET |
| Week 15 |
GB |
| Week 16 |
@PIT |
| Week 17 |
OAK |
|
| Raiders
(1-2) |
| Score |
Opp. |
| 20-25 |
@TEN |
| 23-20 |
CIN |
| 10-31 |
@DEN |
| Week 4 |
SD |
| Week 5 |
@CHI |
| Week 6 |
@CLE |
| Week 7 |
KC |
| Week 8 |
BYE |
| Week 9 |
@DET |
| Week 10 |
NYJ |
| Week 11 |
MIN |
| Week 12 |
@KC |
| Week 13 |
DEN |
| Week 14 |
@PIT |
| Week 15 |
BAL |
| Week 16 |
GB |
| Week 17 |
@SD |
|
(Statistics
are game
averages from
current season ) |