As predicted, the books cleaned up on the new players last week. The line had 12 home favorites week 1 and that was way more than was reasonable. Only nine home teams won their games SU and only seven covered the spread. The most damage was done on the Ravens game (a road favorite vs. Cleveland). Everyone was betting Baltimore as a third of all money wagered last week came in on this game. Needless to say, it was a huge loss for the players. The public won only three games, the Lions game early and the other two late when the heavily supported Eagles covered against the Giants and the Vikings covered against the Cowboys.
This week, the Sports Gods change their focus to the overs. Total points per game in week one was a paltry 38.9 points, well below the league average of 41 points per game. I expected a shift for the sports gods to take away the players advantage. But no, they seem intent on hunting the public that plays overs by making the average total line 42.6. I’ll take the points and look under the total this week. The line is still stacked against the home favorites with 11 home favorites, so it’s money on the dogs week 2.
Last week’s performance ATS showed why using 2003 statistics to forecast 2004 games is no advantage. I went 7-7-2 (50%) with my side picks indicating no advantage for the sharp player. Toss out those old stats and rely on trends and fundamentals until the data comes in. My winning % on sides should turn up at the end of the month when there’s enough data points. On the other hand, totals did much better with a 10-6 (62.5%) mark for the opening week. I’ll try and keep that pace up this week.
ST. LOUIS AT ATLANTA
Vegas Line
ATL -2.5 TOTAL 47 (bet down to 46)
Predicted Outcome
STL 24 ATL 21
Records
STL
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
ATL
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
STL Side
The Rams have a long term loss ATS trend in away games (19-28-1), but St. Louis is very good on turf (70%). This makes sense in that most of the Rams away games are played on grass while visiting teams have a surface disadvantage. Using the same logic the Rams aren’t a great road favorite either. And given that most of the NFC plays on grass, St. Louis isn’t very good ATS against their conference as well.
ATL Side
The Falcons, on the other hand, have not been very good at home covering just 36% of the games ATS from 2001-2003. As a home dog, they’re worse, with a record of 6-12-1 from 1998-2003 in that situation. Last season, the Falcons were just 1-7-1 as a home dog. Against good teams, and by good I mean playoff teams, ATL is just 5-11-2 ATS from 2001-2003.
STL Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: 1st 4 games
UNDER TRENDS: VS. Conference
ATL Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: None
UNDER TRENDS: None
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
STL |
|
|
ATL |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 10/13/2003 |
ATL 0 |
STL 36 |
496 |
119 |
377 |
209 |
73 |
136 |
| 1/6/2002 |
ATL 13 |
STL 31 |
458 |
192 |
266 |
255 |
107 |
148 |
| 12/2/2001 |
STL 35 |
ATL 6 |
422 |
89 |
333 |
320 |
128 |
192 |
Commentary
Can someone please explain to me how the Falcons are favored in this game? When the number first came up, I thought it was a mistake. My second thought was that this must be a trap. Then I ran to the window before the number changed.
The series history is that the Rams kill the Falcons. Over the last three years, Atlanta has yet to hold St. Louis to under 30 points. On the other hand, the Falcons have averaged just six points per contest against the Rams defense. That said the Falcons didn’t have QB Michael Vick available. Last season, Vick had a broken wheel and missed the game. Six points for the Falcons sounds a bit low for having that great talent on the field so I made and adjustment upwards to compensate.
Atlanta looked good in the first 20 minutes of the 49ers game, but faded down the stretch and nearly had the game go into overtime. The Falcons offensive line did not look good against the 49ers blitz and ATL’s receivers also couldn’t get open against the SF’s man coverage. The Falcons rushing game managed just four first downs and the passing game had only eight. Even Vick had a so-so day either with just 163 net passing yards.
The Rams self-destructed against the lowly Cardinals. STL tore up the Cardinals defense, amassing 448 total yards. Arizona couldn’t stop the run (STL averaged 5.9 yards per rush) and they couldn’t slow down the Rams passing game either (averaged 8.0 yards per reception). St. Louis had 27 first downs vs. 14 for the Cardinals. But three turnovers killed long drives by the Rams offense and the Cardinals covered with the game going under the total.
I just can’t find a reason not to take the Rams and the points. Say what you want about their offensive line, but if a team rushes for 176 yards, they didn’t get there by magic, someone has to be blocking. I think St. Louis will be able to run the ball and then attack a questionable Atlanta secondary. This is my best side bet of the week and I think the game goes under the total but don’t see an advantage in this play.
PITTSBURGH AT BALTIMORE
Vegas Line
BAL -4 TOTAL 36
Predicted Outcome
BAL 14 PIT 20
Records
PIT
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
BAL
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
PIT Side
Pittsburgh has no trends in play other than the home team has won the last three contests.
BAL Side
The Ravens are a very tough home side winning 63% of their games (27-16-5) in the period 1998-2003. BAL is also good favorites winning 60% of their contests in that situation during that same period and 70% of their games as home favorites.
PIT Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: DOG, ROAD DOG, PLAYOFF TEAMS
BAL Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: 1ST 4 GAMES
Recent Meetings
|
|
|
|
PIT |
|
BAL |
|
|
Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 12/28/2003 |
PIT 10 |
BAL 13 |
214 |
56 |
158 |
279 |
123 |
156 |
| 9/7/2003 |
BAL 15 |
PIT 34 |
339 |
98 |
241 |
231 |
88 |
143 |
| 12/29/2002 |
BAL 31 |
PIT 34 |
351 |
175 |
176 |
422 |
114 |
308 |
| 10/27/2002 |
PIT 31 |
BAL 18 |
283 |
110 |
173 |
360 |
67 |
293 |
| 1/20/2002 |
BAL 10 |
PIT 27 |
297 |
154 |
143 |
150 |
22 |
128 |
| 12/16/2001 |
PIT 26 |
BAL 21 |
476 |
158 |
318 |
207 |
58 |
149 |
| 11/4/2001 |
BAL 13 |
PIT 10 |
348 |
123 |
225 |
183 |
41 |
142 |
Commentary
Looking only at the statistics, the Ravens should have won their game against the Browns. Baltimore had more first downs (16-10), more total plays (67-55), better average per rush (3.4-2.9), and more completed passes (38-24), but they lost the big one…turnovers (3-0) and lost the game. The Browns stacked the line, put a corner on the Ravens tight end and dared BAL QB Kyle Boller and the Ravens receivers to beat them…and he couldn’t. Getting a Pro Bowl starting tackle back in the line-up will help the Ravens offense, but moving the ball will be problematic until Baltimore gets consistent QB play.
The Steelers took an early lead on the Raiders behind their new running game, got tied, and then had to win the game on a late drive. The game went over, but that was the result of both teams turning over the ball in their own territory more than offensive proficiency. The Steelers managed just 237 total yards against the Raiders. The Ravens defense is better, so don’t expect a lot of scoring from PIT.
I want no part of either side. I won’t put money again on BAL until Boller shows me he can beat man coverage and I can’t bet the Steelers on the road with a new conservative offense against a very tough Ravens defense. I like an under play as a way of giving thumbs down to both offenses.
HOUSTON AT DETROIT
Vegas Line
DET -3 TOTAL 43.5
Predicted Outcome
HOU 24 DET 21
Records
HOU
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
DET
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
HOU Side
Houston hasn’t been in the NFL long enough to build up any long-term trends. They have done well against the NFC, but eight total games isn’t enough for me to trust.
DET Side
The Lions are not good home favorites…they have a record of just 6-11-0 since 1998 in that situation. Detroit doesn’t do well against the AFC (8-16) ATS in that same period.
HOU Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: VS. CONFERENCE, 1 ST 4 GAMES
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
DET Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: HOME FAVORITE
Recent Meetings
NO RECENT MEETINGS
Commentary
The Lions should be flying high after their first road win since dinosaurs roamed the land. Statistically, they were beaten by the Bears last week. There may be a let-down this week as the Motor City Kitties return home for a game against the nearly-expansion Texans.
The Lions lost first downs 13-18, total yards 262-342, rushing yards 77-128, and passing yards 185-214 last week to Chicago. The 2.6 yards per carry is the most disturbing as it indicates the Lions will not be able to control games on the ground once again. And then there’s Detroit’s normal injury problems- the Lions have once again lost a starting receiver for the season.
Houston ’s stats on offense last Sunday were better than the Lions- but they were only equal to the Chargers, except for the two interceptions and two fumbles which cost the Texans the game. Houston gained 336 yards, but gave up 324 total net yards, had 110 yards rushing, but gave up 122, and so on.
I really don’t like the fact that the Lions can’t run the ball and are coming off an emotional victory over a divisional foe. On the other hand, Houston doesn’t have a history of going on the road a winning games either (just seven total road wins ATS in franchise history). Not a game I’m going to get involved in as there are better opportunities, but I like Houston to pull the upset.
CHICAGO AT GREEN BAY
Vegas Line
GB -9 TOTAL 42.5
Predicted Outcome
GB 27 CHI 17
Records
CHI
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
GB
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
CHI Side
They always lose to the Packers
GB Side
They always beat the Bears if Bret Favre is in the building.
CHI Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: ROAD, ROAD DOG
GB Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: FAVORITE, VS. DIVISION
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
CHI |
|
|
GB |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 12/7/2003 |
CHI 21 |
GB 34 |
275 |
44 |
231 |
307 |
97 |
210 |
| 9/29/2003 |
GB 38 |
CHI 23 |
361 |
181 |
180 |
380 |
187 |
193 |
| 12/1/2002 |
CHI 20 |
GB 30 |
304 |
74 |
230 |
396 |
181 |
215 |
| 10/7/2002 |
GB 34 |
CHI 21 |
380 |
45 |
335 |
457 |
124 |
333 |
| 12/9/2001 |
CHI 7 |
GB 17 |
189 |
50 |
139 |
352 |
167 |
185 |
| 11/11/2001 |
GB 20 |
CHI 12 |
262 |
43 |
219 |
368 |
100 |
268 |
| 12/3/2000 |
GB 28 |
CHI 6 |
330 |
104 |
226 |
304 |
81 |
223 |
Commentary
I expect a little letdown for the Packers after they man-handled the Panthers on Monday night, but this is a Bears game and that seems to bring out the best from Green Bay year after year.
The Packers are averaging 29 points per game in the series while the Bear average just 17. The 12 point edge is more than the 9 point spread and should favor the Packers with an edge to the over as well.
The Bears hired Mr. L. Smith as head coach, if for no other reason than he had beaten the Packers while he coached for the Rams. It sounds far fetched, but such is the hatred in this series that Chicago would probably go to any lengths just to beat Brett Favre. Coming off a home loss to Detroit, this Bears team can’t be in good spirits for a trip to Wisconsin.
Perhaps, the Packers are looking past this game…no, it’s still the Bears and the Packers, lay the points with Green Bay and take the over.
DENVER AT JACKSONVILLE
Vegas Line
DEN -3 TOTAL 41
Predicted Outcome
DEN 17, JAX 14
Records
DEN
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
JAX
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
DEN Side
The Broncos are not a good road team ATS. Denver is 9-14-1 in their last two seasons on the road. However, they are worse against their conference foes going 9-19-0 in the period 1998-2003.
JAX Side
No trends in this game.
DEN Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: FAVORITE, VS. CONFERENCE
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
JAX Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: HOME DOG
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
Recent Meetings
NO RECENT MEETINGS
Commentary
This looks like a letdown game for the Broncos. They were really up for the hated Chiefs on Sunday night, now they have to travel across the country to play in hot and humid conditions.
Looking at the stats from last week’s games is more or less meaningless because there’s a world of difference between the Chiefs defense and the Bills. Kansas City couldn’t stop a Girl Scout troop while Buffalo is one of the great under teams in the NFL. Had I bothered to plug the numbers into the handicapping formula, Denver would have been a big favorite which is misleading under these circumstances. That said the Jaguars are built to stop the run, starting two very physical defensive tackles. This will be a better test of Denver’s new rushing game then the Broncos got last week.
Jacksonville could win this game in an upset, but I can’t lay money with their offense right now. They had to covert three fourth down plays on the Jag’s final drive just to score a touchdown against the Bills last week. Denver can play a little defense as well, so I suspect this will be a tight, low-scoring game. I have an under ticket in my pocket as I think the Broncos won’t bring their A game in the heat and humidity while the Jaguars offense is still looking for a breakout game on offense. Maybe the latest hurricane will bring in some weather as well.
CAROLINA AT KANSAS CITY
Vegas Line
KC -5 TOTAL 46
Predicted Outcome
KC 24 CAR 17
Records
CAR
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
KC
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
CAR Side
Carolina has been good in this situation. As a Dog, they are 18-12-1 since 2001 and 32-22-3 since 1998. The Panthers are also 25-11-1 ATS against playoff teams.
KC Side
Arrowhead is one of the worst places for visitor to play. The crowd noise is so deafening that teams often can’t audible. It makes sense that the Chiefs are 21-14-1 as home favorites since 1998.
CAR Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: 1 ST 4 GAMES
KC Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
Recent Meetings
NO RECENT MEETINGS
Commentary
I like the Chiefs in this game mostly for their advantage in the running game. Despite their loss at Denver, RB Priest Holmes looked, well like Priest Holmes should look…terrific. He led Kansas City with 151 rushing yards, a 5.8 yards per carry average and three touchdowns. Meanwhile, the Panthers running game was doing a whole bunch of nothing, and that says a lot against a very ordinary Packers defense. Defensively, neither team could stop the opposing running games of Denver and Green Bay. So it’s logical to assume that this game sets up to be a running contest where both teams try and ram it down the other’s throats.
With the loss of Carolina’s best wide receiver and return man, I like the Chiefs even more. Panthers QB Jake Delhome did not look good in his opening game and without his favorite wide receiver he’s going to feel the heat from KC’s blitz. The Chief are going to put eight and nine in the box to make Carolina one-dimensional. If the Panthers fail to adjust to the blitz like they did on Monday night, this game won’t be close. If they can grind out first downs on the ground or find a tight end that can run down the field and catch the ball, Carolina can stay in the game. I just can’t take a visitor against the Chiefs in Arrowhead off a KC loss-give me KC.
SAN FRANCISCO AT NEW ORLEANS
Vegas Line
NO -7 TOTAL 42.5
Predicted Outcome
NO 27 SF 17
Records
SF
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
NO
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS HOME (0-1-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-1-0)
Trends
SF Side
The 49ers have the normal West Coast dichotomy- they cover at home and get blown-out on the road. San Francisco is just 8-13-3 ATS on the road since 2001 and 16-28-4 since 1998.
NO Side
The Saints don’t have any significant trends in this situation.
SF Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: TURF, ROAD DOG
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
NO Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
SF |
|
|
NO |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 10/20/2002 |
SF 27 |
NO 35 |
418 |
143 |
275 |
422 |
179 |
243 |
| 1/6/2002 |
SF 38 |
NO 0 |
407 |
138 |
269 |
126 |
40 |
86 |
| 11/11/2001 |
NO 27 |
SF 28 |
415 |
164 |
251 |
488 |
152 |
336 |
Commentary
I’m looking for a bounce-back effort from the Saints at home this week. New Orleans needs this win more than the 49ers do. Starting 0-2 SU at home and 0-2 vs. conference would be digging themselves a big hole early in the season. While their divisional foes ( Tampa Bay, Carolina, and Atlanta) didn’t look good either and 1-1 will probably lead this division after two games, New Orleans doesn’t want to spot the Panthers two home games. I look for a “spirited” week of practice for the Saints and NO should be breathing fire by kick-off.
It will be interesting to see how the 49ers come off their heart-breaking loss to the Falcons at home. For those of you that hadn’t heard, they didn’t convert a two-point conversion on the last play of the game. I suspect that this young team may have their tails down this week and will have a hard time putting the Atlanta game past them.
Motivationally, New Orleans has the advantage. They are also fundamentally the far more talented team. Unfortunately, they are the Saints and are prone to making the critical mistake. A touchdown is too much to lay for my comfort level, so I won’t play the game as a side.
WASHINGTON AT NEW YORK GIANTS
Vegas Line
WAS -3 TOTAL 42
Predicted Outcome
WAS 21 NYG 14
Records
WAS
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
NYG
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
WAS Side
The Redskins are a pretty good road team, but nothing to bet on. It’s been a long time since they’ve been a road favorite so there’s little data to go on to see if there’s any kind of edge that can be played. However, the Redskins have struggled against their own division going 16-26-2 since 1998 ATS.
NYG Side
No significant trends for the Giants in this situation.
WAS Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
NYG Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: GRASS, 1 ST 4 GAMES
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
WAS |
|
|
NYG |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 12/7/2003 |
WAS 20 |
NYG 7 |
288 |
150 |
138 |
220 |
120 |
100 |
| 9/21/2003 |
NYG 24 |
WAS 21 |
456 |
124 |
332 |
399 |
129 |
270 |
| 12/8/2002 |
NYG 27 |
WAS 21 |
447 |
132 |
315 |
316 |
111 |
205 |
| 11/17/2002 |
WAS 17 |
NYG 19 |
166 |
60 |
106 |
299 |
88 |
211 |
| 10/28/2001 |
NYG 21 |
WAS 35 |
353 |
157 |
196 |
388 |
42 |
346 |
| 10/7/2001 |
WAS 9 |
NYG 23 |
181 |
57 |
124 |
309 |
142 |
167 |
Commentary
I refuse to put money on the Giants right now. This team is unhappy. It’s pretty obvious to me by their performance and by the grievances they’ve filed against their new head coach that they aren’t buying whatever Tom Coughlin is selling. The G-Men’s offensive line is just dreadful and their defense (especially that train wreck of a secondary) can’t stop anyone. This team may well implode by October and by that time QB Warner will be in the hospital or replaced by Eli Manning.
The Redskins won their game, but the offense wasn’t exactly clicking. Mark Brunell has 125 yards passing in a grind it out game where the visiting Buc’s had only 10 snaps on offense in the first half. RB Clinton Portis did the damage on offense with a big run for a touchdown to start the game but then showed some durability by playing his part in Washington’s ball-control offense. The Redskins didn’t score another touchdown in the game, but the only major against them came on a fumble return for a touchdown by Tampa’s defense, so an improved effort by Washington’s defense.
To me, this is an under game all they way. Washington’s going to pound away with their running game and shorten the game while the Giants offense will continue to struggle. Already have my under ticket and looking forward to making more money off the Giants each and every week.
INDIANAPOLIS AT TENNESSEE
Vegas Line
TEN -1.5 TOTAL 47
Predicted Outcome
IND 24 TEN 21
Records
IND
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS AWAY (0-1-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U AWAY (1-0-0)
TEN
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
IND Side
No significant trends in this game.
TEN Side
No significant trends in this game.
IND Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: ROAD, DOG, GRASS, ROAD DOG
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
TEN Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: VS.CONFERENCE
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
IND |
|
|
TEN |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 12/7/2003 |
IND 29 |
TEN 27 |
338 |
117 |
221 |
327 |
93 |
234 |
| 9/14/2003 |
TEN 7 |
IND 33 |
291 |
127 |
164 |
236 |
53 |
183 |
| 12/8/2002 |
IND 17 |
TEN 27 |
389 |
92 |
297 |
348 |
119 |
229 |
| 11/3/2002 |
TEN 23 |
IND 15 |
378 |
80 |
298 |
198 |
121 |
77 |
Commentary
This is another game where I think the wrong team is favored in this contest. The Titans are playing at home and Adelphi is a difficult place to walk in and come out with a win, but the Colts have so much going on offense that it’s hard for me to imagine that they will self-destruct two games in a row.
Indianapolis should have beaten the Patriots on opening day. Had it not been for and interception and a fumble inside New England’s five yard line, the Colts would be favored in this game with the Titans. I think the Patriots defense is better than the Titans, so expect another offensive show from the Colts.
Tennessee had a tune-up game with Miami on Saturday. They went down to Florida and worked on their running game while the Dolphins showed all their warts on offense. I didn’t learn much from that game because it wasn’t broadcast nationally, but having that the Titans top running back dinged doesn’t help Tennessee’s cause.
If Indianapolis is going to get to the Super Bowl, they can’t go two games behind the Patriots with a loss head-to-head. They do not want to go to New England in January. It’s early to say this is a must-win game, but assuming the Pats go 13-3 or 12-4 this season, the Colts would have to run the table, go 13-1, or 12-2 the rest of the season to host a playoff game against New England. Motivational edge goes to the Colts here, and I’ve already got my ticket.
SEATTLE AT TAMPA BAY
Vegas Line
NO LINE
Predicted Outcome
None
Records
SEA
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS AWAY (1-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-1-0)
TB
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
SEA Side
The Seahawks are bad road favorites going 3-8-2 in that situation since 1998.
TB Side
The Buc’s play good teams tough at home. They are 25-16-4 at home against playoff teams since 1998.
SEA Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: VS. CONFERENCE
UNDER TRENDS: FAVORITE
TB Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: HOME DOG
UNDER TRENDS: VS. CONFERENCE
Recent Meetings
NO RECENT MEETINGS
Commentary
Vegas is still waiting for the word on Seattle’s running back situation.
NEW ENGLAND AT ARIZONA
Vegas Line
NE -8 TOTAL 41.5
Predicted Outcome
NE 20 ARI 14
Records
NE
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (0-0-1), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
ARI
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
NE Side
The Patriots aren’t great road favorites. They are just 4-10-1 in that situation since 1998.
ARI Side
The Cardinals always seem to struggle ATS. The red birds are just 30-45-0 as dogs and 8-16-0 against the AFC since 1998.
NE Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
ARI Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: HOME, GRASS, HOME DOG, VS. CONFERENCE, 1 ST 4 GAMES
Recent Meetings
NO RECENT MEETINGS
Commentary
This is a classic let-down game. The Patriots are coming off an opening night thriller against the Colts and now go to the desert to play a day game in 100 degree heat against a Cardinals team that beat both the Packers and the Vikings on their home field last season.
There is no obvious reason you should be betting the Cardinals because New England is the Super Bowl champs, if they aren’t they best team then New England is among the best squads in the NFL, and if the Pats could beat the Colts by three, covering this number against Arizona should be a piece of cake. On the other hand, the Cardinals are the worst franchise in the NFL, and if they aren’t the worst team this season, they will end up somewhere in the bottom four, and if the Cardinals lost to the Rams by a touchdown, they should lose by more than that number to the Super Bowl champs. If you don’t believe the Cardinals can win, neither will the Patriots. New England will come out flat, its offense will wilt in the 100 plus degree heat, and the Cardinals will keep this game close.
CLEVELAND AT DALLAS
Vegas Line
DAL -4.5 TOTAL 39
Predicted Outcome
DAL 21 CLE 17
Records
CLE
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
DAL
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
CLE Side
The Browns have a favorable ATS record against playoff teams. Cleveland is 13-8-1 in that situation.
DAL Side
The Cowboys are good ATS at home (28-17-3) since 1998, but not very good against the AFC (8-15-1).
CLE Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
DAL Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: 1 ST 4 GAMES
UNDER TRENDS: FAVORITE, VS. AFC
Recent Meetings
NO RECENT MEETINGS
Commentary
The Cowboys are coming off a loss to the Vikings in which the ‘Boys secondary struggled in coverage against Randy Moss. The secondary struggled in part because Dallas’ pass rush was non-existent. On the other hand, Dallas’ offense looked decent and the ‘Boys offensive line did a pretty good job protecting the quarterback.
The Browns are coming off a big week in which they beat the hated Ravens at home. Cleveland didn’t put up great numbers in that contest, but you wouldn’t expect great offensive numbers when both teams line up and hammer the ball on the ground at each other.
I just don’t see Bill Parcells starting the season out 0-2 SU. Cowboy practice season must have been a little more physical this week as the motivational edge goes to the ‘Boys. Not a game I’m going to run out and bet, but I think the Cowboys win this game and cover the spread.
BUFFALO AT OAKLAND
Vegas Line
OAK -3.5 TOTAL 38
Predicted Outcome
OAK 17 BUF 14
Records
BUF
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
OAK
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
BUF Side
The Bills have no significant recent trends.
OAK Side
The Raiders have no significant recent trends.
BUF Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
OAK Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: HOME, HOME FAVORITE, 1 ST 4 GAMES
UNDER TRENDS: VS. CONFERENCE, SHORT TERM UNDER STREAK
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
BUF |
|
|
OAK |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 10/6/2002 |
OAK 49 |
BUF 31 |
479 |
80 |
399 |
495 |
142 |
353 |
Commentary
The bankroll I’ve made betting Bills games under continues to grow. As long as statuesque QB Bledsoe continues to play tackling dummy behind a very shaky offensive line guard-to-guard and the Bills defense is healthy and in a nasty mood, I’m playing the under when Buffalo goes on the road.
The Raiders were a mixed bag last week, looking desperate early in their game against Pittsburgh but being able to move the ball through the air when Oakland’s offense started clicking. The running game was scarce and the Raiders will need to be more balanced on offense or it will be tee-off time on QB Rich Gannon. Oakland’s offensive line isn’t as talented this year as it has been in the past and it’s not going protect Gannon from bodily harm if the Raiders drop back and pass 40 times per game.
The Bills offense is simply dreadful on the road for the past few years. Bledsoe looks like a deer caught in the headlight as the rushers fall around him. ‘Not confident that situation gets better this week as Oakland will blitz more and test the Bills receivers and offensive line.
NEW YORK JETS AT SAN DIEGO
Vegas Line
NYJ -3 TOTAL 45.5
Predicted Outcome
NYJ 27 SD 21
Records
NYJ
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
SD
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
NYJ Side
The Jets are a very good road team ATS. New York has a 29-16-3 record in that situation since 1998.
SD Side
The Chargers are a poor home favorite. The Bolt-heads are 7-11-1 in that situation since 1998.
NYJ Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: VS.CONFERENCE
SD Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: NONE
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
NYJ |
|
|
SD |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 11/3/2002 |
NYJ 44 |
SD 13 |
413 |
165 |
248 |
243 |
73 |
170 |
Commentary
The Jets look like my over team this season so long as Pennington stays healthy and the NYJ defense can’t stop anyone.
Pennington is one of the few quarterbacks that can complete 60% of his passes week after week. That incredible accuracy opens up opposing defenses and stretches them not only vertically, but also from sideline to sideline. As a result, the Jets running game looks better than it probably is because opposing linebackers are playing off the line of scrimmage in order to quickly get back into their drop zones. RB Curtis Martin looked half his age last week and the Jets offense dismantled the Bengals’ defense.
The Chargers running game should have its way with the Jets defense. New York has yet to find an answer on the interior of its defensive line and the increase in speed on the defensive roster has yet to pay dividends. This game may be another shoot-out and I’ll be playing the game Jets and over the total.
MIAMI AT CINCINNATI
Vegas Line
CIN -5.5 TOTAL 38.5
Predicted Outcome
CIN 14 MIA 13
Records
MIA
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (0-1-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
CIN
SU (0-1-0)
ATS (0-1-0), ATS HOME (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U HOME (0-0-0)
Trends
MIA Side
The Dolphins are good choices ATS against conference foes. Miami is 21-6-1 since 1998 in that situation and 16-8-0 in their first four games of the season since 1998.
CIN Side
The Bengals reached the .500 mark last season and that is the first time in some time that they haven’t been among the league’s worst teams. Naturally, Cincinnati’s ATS record reflects those unhappy times. The Bengals are just 19-27-2 at home since 1998 and 5-8-1 as a home favorite.
MIA Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS:
UNDER TRENDS: ROADDOG, VS. CONFERENCE, 1 ST 4 GAMES
CIN Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: VS. CONFERENCE
UNDER TRENDS: 1 ST 4 GAMES
Recent Meetings
NO RECENT MEETINGS
Commentary
Butt-ugly game of the week. A bad match-up for both offenses is another under play for me.
The Bengals have to pass the ball to score. Unfortunately, the Dolphins’ strength on defense is their secondary. That puts a lot of pressure on the Bengals new starting QB. He has to carry this Bengals team, but if he makes a mistake Miami will capitalize.
I don’t see how either team is going to put together 75 yard drives. This looks like another slug-it-out game where both squad play conservative and try to avoid the fatal mistake. That’s an under formula in my book and I bet that before I jump on either squad.
MINNESOTA AT PHILADELPHIA
Vegas Line
PHI -3.5 TOTAL 48.5
Predicted Outcome
PHI 28 MIN 24
Records
MIN
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS AWAY (0-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U AWAY (0-0-0)
PHI
SU (1-0-0)
ATS (1-0-0), ATS HOME (1-0-0)
OVER/UNDER (1-0-0), O/U HOME (1-0-0)
Trends
MIN Side
Like most teams that ply inside domes, the Vikings struggle ATS when they have to play outside. Minnesota is 18-28-2 on the road.
PHI Side
The Eagles are one of the great ATS teams since 1998. Philadelphia is 26-15-1 as a favorite, 34-20-4 on turf, 20-7-1 vs. conference, and 18-10-1 against teams >.500.
MIN Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: ROAD, DOG, ROAD DOG, VS. CONFERENCE, 1 ST 4 GAMES
UNDER TRENDS: NONE
PHI Total (1998-2003)
OVER TRENDS: HOME FAVORITE
UNDER TRENDS: TURF
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
MIN |
|
|
PHI |
|
Date |
Away |
Home |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
Total |
Rush |
Pass |
| 11/11/2001 |
MIN 17 |
PHI 48 |
301 |
56 |
245 |
487 |
272 |
215 |
Commentary
Over, over, over….this game is going way over the total as neither teams’ defense is going to do anything to slow down the opposing offense.
Taking away the Giants big touchdown run at the end of their contest with Philadelphia and the Eagles still did nothing to slow down the Giants rushing attack. NYG averaged an indecent 8.2 yards per carry on the ground against Philadelphia. Minnesota has a huge offensive line and will outweigh the Eagles defensive line by a considerable margin. The Vikings averaged 4.9 yards per carry against a better Cowboys defense last week. That offensive line is going to pound Philadelphia’s front, setting up play action down the field for the big play.
The Eagles will counter by matching up Terrell Owens on a shaky Vikings secondary. Owens is much too physical for any of the Vikings corners and Minnesota doesn’t get enough of a pass rush to take the pressure of the Vike’s secondary. He may get another three touchdowns this week. Scoring over seven touchdowns in a professional game is difficult to do, but I just don’t see it any other way.
College Thoughts
In no particular order:
Michigan St . +3
UCON +7.5
Rutgers -12.5
SDSU +20.5
Kansas +3
Georgia Tech -9
Minnesota -4
Virginia -31
|