HOUSTON AT N.Y. JETS
Vegas Line
NYJ -6.5 TOTAL 39
Predicted Outcome
No prediction
Records
HOU
SU (5-6-0)
ATS (6-5-0), ATS AWAY (2-3-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-4-1), O/U AWAY (2-2-1)
NYJ
SU (8-3-0)
ATS (6-4-1), ATS HOME (2-3-0)
OVER/UNDER (5-6-0), O/U HOME (3-2-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
HOU |
|
|
NYJ |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 10/19/2003 |
NYJ 19 |
HOU 14 |
325 |
169 |
156 |
296 |
136 |
160 |
Commentary
The first game with a question mark at quarterback, this time it’s the Jets who may get QB Chad Pennington back into the line-up. If that happens, and that’s a big if, then you’d think the Jets offense should improve significantly. With Quincy Carter, the Jets relied on their defense to win games. Pennington is able to win games with his arm while Quincy Carter has done nothing at quarterback. Pennington is worth at least a touchdown more to the Jets offense and that’s a big point swing both for the sides and the total in this game. If Pennington plays, New York’s offense can open up and score some points which changes the complexion of this game entirely.
For the Texans, this game may come down to who controls the line of scrimmage. If the Jets defense wins, the Texans will be unable to run the ball once again and QB David Carr will be under siege because the Jets have a pretty decent pass rush. If the Texans offensive line wins, Carr will have enough time to throw and the Texans will be a real threat to pull the upset.
I wouldn’t hazard a guess on this game without knowing the status of Pennington. A touchdown is way too much to lay if Quincy Carter is my quarterback however.
CINCINNATI AT BALTIMORE
Vegas Line
BAL -7 TOTAL 37.5
Predicted Outcome
BAL 17 CIN 10
Records
CIN
SU (5-6-0)
ATS (4-6-1), ATS AWAY (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (5-6-0), O/U AWAY (4-1-0)
BAL
SU (7-4-0)
ATS (8-3-0), ATS HOME (4-1-0)
OVER/UNDER (5-6-0), O/U HOME (4-1-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
CIN |
|
|
BAL |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 9/26/2004 |
BAL 23 |
CIN 9 |
398 |
109 |
289 |
380 |
254 |
126 |
| 12/7/2003 |
CIN 13 |
BAL 31 |
268 |
100 |
168 |
353 |
223 |
130 |
| 10/19/2003 |
BAL 26 |
CIN 34 |
303 |
59 |
244 |
391 |
110 |
281 |
| 12/1/2002 |
BAL 27 |
CIN 23 |
381 |
73 |
308 |
247 |
148 |
99 |
| 11/10/2002 |
CIN 27 |
BAL 38 |
372 |
123 |
249 |
325 |
162 |
163 |
| 12/23/2001 |
CIN 0 |
BAL 16 |
281 |
150 |
131 |
305 |
157 |
148 |
| 9/23/2001 |
BAL 10 |
CIN 21 |
203 |
67 |
136 |
382 |
64 |
318 |
Commentary
I’m having a really hard time with this game. You have two teams that have won three of their last four games and are playing some of their best football of the season. On the other hand, these are two teams that haven’t looked good in wining those games and the score lines are a bit misleading.
Each team has played Cleveland and Dallas in the last month. The Bengals beat both teams: they beat the Browns 58-48 in a barn-burner last Sunday and beat the Cowboys 26-3 on 11/7/2004. Both games were played in Cincinnati. The Ravens beat Cleveland 27-13 on 11/7/2004 and beat the Cowboys 31-10. Both of those games were home contests as well. Not great wins for either team, but all the victories were comfortable and by ten points or more.
Inside the box scores however, Baltimore has had there problems running the ball, which is unusual as you normally think of the Ravens as a rushing team with Jamal Lewis in the backfield. QB Kyle Boller has stepped up and played better, but probably not well enough to cover this big number by himself. Cincinnati isn’t a good road team as their 1-4 ATS record indicates so I’m not entirely opposed to laying points with Baltimore despite their offensive problems.
I think the Under is the best play as I can find fault with either offense. I don’t foresee Cincinnati having a big rushing day and grinding out first downs against a stingy Ravens defense. The Bengals are going to have to mix it up and get a few big plays to win. I also don’t see the Ravens dominating the Bengals defense unless T Jonathan Ogden is back in the line-up. Baltimore is going to have to take some chances as well. If you don’t get a defensive score, this game should go under the total as both offenses should struggle for consistency.
NEW ENGLAND AT CLEVELAND
Vegas Line
NE -10.5 Total 41
Predicted Outcome
NE 24 CLE 6
Records
NE
SU (10-1-0)
ATS (8-1-2), ATS AWAY (4-1-0)
OVER/UNDER (5-5-1), O/U AWAY (3-2-0)
CLE
SU (3-8-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS HOME (4-2-0)
OVER/UNDER (5-6-0), O/U HOME (2-4-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
NE |
|
|
CLE |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 10/26/2003 |
CLE 3 |
NE 9 |
347 |
94 |
253 |
203 |
84 |
119 |
| 12/9/2001 |
CLE 16 |
NE 27 |
290 |
81 |
209 |
277 |
50 |
227 |
Commentary
There’s a big question at quarterback here for the Browns. QB Kelly Holcomb may not be able to play and that makes Luke McCown, a fourth-round pick from Louisiana Tech, the starting quarterback. The line jumped from eight points to ten and a half on the news. Kelly Holcomb sustained three crack ribs in last week's loss to Cincinnati and may give it a shot this week, but the chances of him playing the entire game would be slim. Holcomb can be an exciting quarterback when he’s in the game, but the Cleveland signal-caller has the distinction of 13 starts and four broken bones, he’s fragile or unlucky to be kind.
Ten and a half is a boat-load of points to lay in a place as dangerous as the dog pound where the Browns are 4-2 ATS this year. But, I sure wouldn’t want Cleveland with a rookie quarterback making his first start against the Patriots defense either. I’ll probably wait for more news before going to the window, but I’ll be on the Patriots and the under if McCown is the starter and Cleveland and the over if Holcomb is healthy.
ARIZONA AT DETROIT
Vegas Line
DET -6 TOTAL 38.5
Predicted Outcome
Detroit 21 ARI 13
Records
ARI
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (6-5-0), ATS AWAY (3-3-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-5-0), O/U AWAY (4-2-0)
DET
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (5-6-0), ATS HOME (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (5-6-0), O/U HOME (2-3-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
ARI |
|
|
DET |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 9/7/2003 |
ARI 24 |
DET 42 |
439 |
95 |
344 |
261 |
66 |
195 |
| 12/8/2002 |
DET 20 |
ARI 23 |
313 |
133 |
180 |
203 |
51 |
152 |
| 11/18/2001 |
DET 38 |
ARI 45 |
417 |
89 |
328 |
478 |
49 |
429 |
Commentary
Two ugly quarterback situations. Arizona tries their third quarterback this season as John Navarre gets the start in Michigan where he played in college for the Wolverines. Josh McCown will be the back-up after starting most of the season and Shaun King becomes the emergency quarterback after struggling in his last two games. Navarre will be seeing his first NFL action and will be teamed with undrafted rookie RB Larry Croom a product of UNLV also getting his first NFL start, after RB Emmitt Smith spent this week in a walking boot nursing his injured toe and will likely miss 2-3 weeks.
Detroit has its own crisis in confidence at quarterback. Joey Harrington will get another start, but he’ll be on a short leash. Harrington has struggled most of 2005 and hasn’t been the answer at quarterback the Lions organization had expected.
Certainly a battle of teams playing without confidence in what should be a low-scoring game. There’s been a big line move on the Lions as the sharps came in to bid up the Lions from three point favorites to six. I think the money’s in the right place here. Give me the Lions and the under.
TENNESSEE AT INDIANAPOLIS
Vegas Line
Predicted Outcome
IND 41 TEN 13
Records
TEN
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS AWAY (3-3-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-5-0), O/U AWAY (3-3-0)
IND
SU (8-3-0)
ATS (7-3-1), ATS HOME (3-2-0)
OVER/UNDER (8-3-0), O/U HOME (4-1-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
TEN |
|
|
IND |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 9/19/2004 |
IND 31 |
TEN 17 |
389 |
153 |
236 |
373 |
129 |
244 |
| 12/7/2003 |
IND 29 |
TEN 27 |
327 |
93 |
234 |
338 |
117 |
221 |
| 9/14/2003 |
TEN 7 |
IND 33 |
236 |
53 |
183 |
291 |
127 |
164 |
| 12/8/2002 |
IND 17 |
TEN 27 |
348 |
119 |
229 |
389 |
92 |
297 |
| 11/3/2002 |
TEN 23 |
IND 15 |
198 |
121 |
77 |
378 |
80 |
298 |
Commentary
QB Steve McNair is talking about retirement this week. Perhaps the endless stream of injuries is finally catching up with him or perhaps having their first losing season in some time is weighing heavily on McNair, but you have to consider his mental state because so much of the Titans offense goes through McNair. Can a Tennessee team with a questionable Steve McNair keep up with a Colts team that has scored 40 or more points in their last three games? I can’t see it.
This is a terrible spot for Tennessee. This is there third straight road game against a division foe. Meanwhile, the Colts have had since Thanksgiving to rest and recuperate after thrashing the Lions on turkey day. I would not expect the Titans offense to be at their best this week, regardless of the rash of injuries that have hit the squad.
RB Chris Brown didn’t practice on Wednesday and probably won’t play as well. LT Jason Mathews will start his third game in a row at left tackle in place of Brad Hopkins. Mathews will matchup against Dwight Freeney and that will likely result in some more hits on McNair.
This is a lot of points when I’m not at all confident that the Titans are going to score all that much. The Colts defense has done better as of late, surrendering an average of 11 points during this streak. That will put me on the Colts and the under here.
MINNESOTA AT CHICAGO
Vegas Line
MIN -7 TOTAL 41
Predicted Outcome
MIN 24 CHI 10
Records
MIN
SU (7-4-0)
ATS (7-4-0), ATS AWAY (4-1-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-5-0), O/U AWAY (4-1-0)
CHI
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (5-6-0), ATS HOME (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (5-6-0), O/U HOME (2-3-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
MIN |
|
|
CHI |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 9/26/2004 |
CHI 22 |
MIN 27 |
443 |
93 |
350 |
385 |
146 |
239 |
| 12/14/2003 |
MIN 10 |
CHI 13 |
393 |
178 |
215 |
232 |
87 |
145 |
| 9/14/2003 |
CHI 13 |
MIN 24 |
400 |
202 |
198 |
208 |
80 |
128 |
| 10/27/2002 |
CHI 7 |
MIN 25 |
364 |
148 |
216 |
218 |
44 |
174 |
| 9/8/2002 |
MIN 23 |
CHI 27 |
364 |
136 |
228 |
368 |
80 |
288 |
| 11/25/2001 |
CHI 13 |
MIN 6 |
316 |
124 |
192 |
235 |
142 |
93 |
Commentary
I don’t see the Bears staying close in this game despite their winning series record. Chicago will be starting another new quarterback as Chad Hutchinson, formerly of the Cowboys, makes his first start as a Bear. There’s money to be made betting against these emergency quarterbacks, and if Hutchinson were capable, the Cowboys wouldn’t have gotten rid of him.
Chicago has nothing to lose. Over the past four weeks the Bears offense has just been terrible. Chicago has just 762 yards total offense in that period, less than 200 yards per game! It can’t get worse, can it? Maybe not, but it isn’t going to get better here despite the Vikings soft defense.
It’s very hard to make the case that this offense is going to keep pace with the Vikings even at home. Randy Moss will be back and that should be enough to cover the touchdown and then some.
BUFFALO AT MIAMI
Vegas Line
BUF -3.5 TOTAL 35.5
Predicted Outcome
BUF 17 MIA 14
Records
BUF
SU (5-6-0)
ATS (7-4-0), ATS AWAY (3-2-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-5-0), O/U AWAY (1-4-0)
MIA
SU (2-9-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS HOME (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-4-1), O/U HOME (2-3-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
BUF |
|
|
MIA |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 10/17/2004 |
MIA 13 |
BUF 20 |
341 |
137 |
204 |
212 |
111 |
101 |
| 12/21/2003 |
MIA 20 |
BUF 3 |
177 |
73 |
104 |
169 |
132 |
37 |
| 9/21/2003 |
BUF 7 |
MIA 17 |
118 |
41 |
77 |
313 |
166 |
147 |
| 12/1/2002 |
MIA 21 |
BUF 38 |
431 |
161 |
270 |
300 |
270 |
30 |
| 10/20/2002 |
BUF 23 |
MIA 10 |
294 |
132 |
162 |
287 |
132 |
155 |
| 1/6/2002 |
BUF 7 |
MIA 34 |
250 |
39 |
211 |
289 |
202 |
87 |
| 11/25/2001 |
MIA 34 |
BUF 27 |
422 |
127 |
295 |
364 |
101 |
263 |
Commentary
The Bills have been an automatic under play on the road for several years now and I don’t see anything that will change my mind here. Miami comes off back-to-back road trips to the west coast and they should be flat. On the other hand, the Dolphins (unlike the Bears) still look like they are going to go out and make an effort, but I think that effort is more likely to occur on defense and that’s probably enough to keep me off the Bills here as Buffalo has improved over the course of the season. Buffalo has improved, but not to the extent that I’m going to lay more than a field goal on the road with them against a motivated team.
ATLANTA AT TAMPA BAY
Vegas Line
PICK TOTAL 39.5
Predicted Outcome
ATL 21 TB 17
Records
ATL
SU (9-2-0)
ATS (5-6-0), ATS AWAY (3-2-0)
OVER/UNDER (3-8-0), O/U AWAY (2-3-0)
TB
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (4-5-2), ATS HOME (3-1-1)
OVER/UNDER (3-8-0), O/U HOME (1-4-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
ATL |
|
|
TB |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 11/14/2004 |
TB 14 |
ATL 24 |
325 |
205 |
120 |
193 |
68 |
125 |
| 12/20/2003 |
ATL 30 |
TB 28 |
267 |
148 |
119 |
440 |
94 |
346 |
| 9/21/2003 |
TB 31 |
ATL 10 |
136 |
29 |
107 |
316 |
132 |
184 |
| 12/8/2002 |
ATL 10 |
TB 34 |
181 |
68 |
113 |
421 |
150 |
271 |
| 10/6/2002 |
TB 20 |
ATL 6 |
243 |
70 |
173 |
327 |
74 |
253 |
Commentary
I know I don’t look at the Falcons as a 9-2 football team. Maybe that’s because Atlanta is only 5-6 against the spread, but I don’t remember the dominance on either side of the ball I’d associate with that kind of record. QB Michael Vick hasn’t really strung four quarters of football together in one game so far this season and the Falcons defense has played well at times and then gets bombed by the Chiefs at other times.
I’m not sure how you get a nine win team as a pick on the road against a four win team. That line looks cheap to me. Atlanta beat the Buc’s 24-14 just three weeks ago. In that game, the Falcons sacked TB QB Brian Griese seven times. The Falcons outgained the Buc’s by 325-193. Do I think Tampa Bay has enough to turn the game around? No. I think the Falcons are in a zone where they’re going to win a lot of close, low-scoring games much like the Panthers did last season.
I’d love to find a reason to support Tampa, but I can’t find one. I think Atlanta wins a close game.
SAN FRANCISCO AT ST LOUIS
Vegas Line
STL -10.5 Total 48
Predicted Outcome
STL 34 SF 20
Records
SF
SU (1-10-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS AWAY (2-3-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-5-0), O/U AWAY (2-3-0)
STL
SU (5-6-0)
ATS (3-7-1), ATS HOME (1-3-1)
OVER/UNDER (8-3-0), O/U HOME (3-2-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
SF |
|
|
STL |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 10/3/2004 |
STL 24 |
SF 14 |
332 |
58 |
274 |
360 |
174 |
186 |
| 11/2/2003 |
STL 10 |
SF 30 |
389 |
165 |
224 |
340 |
9 |
331 |
| 9/14/2003 |
SF 24 |
STL 27 |
390 |
148 |
242 |
278 |
88 |
190 |
| 12/30/2002 |
SF 20 |
STL 31 |
329 |
193 |
136 |
263 |
35 |
228 |
| 10/6/2002 |
STL 13 |
SF 37 |
386 |
179 |
207 |
313 |
88 |
225 |
| 12/9/2001 |
SF 14 |
STL 27 |
220 |
76 |
144 |
385 |
115 |
270 |
| 9/23/2001 |
STL 30 |
SF 26 |
232 |
116 |
116 |
424 |
115 |
309 |
Commentary
The 49ers are the worst team in the NFL, and this year, that’s saying something. They are just pathetic. San Francisco’s defense has completely fallen apart over the last month. Opposing offenses have scored 42, 37, 35, and 24 points over the past four weeks, and I don’t expect the 49ers to be able to shut down the Rams offense, which despite the loss in Green Bay, has been able to move the ball through the air.
The Rams defense isn’t showing up either. St. Louis’ defense has given up big points over a five game period where the Rams have lost four games. The Dolphins scored 31, the Patriots scored 40, the Bills scored 37, and the Packers put up 45. I don’t see the Rams getting any better either, but I don’t think they’ve quit just yet.
I’m not comfortable laying 10.5 points with a team that can’t stop anyone on defense and I really don’t want the 49ers. That’s going to put me on the over here as I don’t see either defense putting up a great effort.
CAROLINA AT NEW ORLEANS
Vegas Line
NO -1.5 TOTAL 46.5
Predicted Outcome
NO 23 CAR 20
Records
CAR
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (6-5-0), ATS AWAY (4-1-0)
OVER/UNDER (4-6-1), O/U AWAY (2-2-1)
NO
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS HOME (1-5-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-5-0), O/U HOME (2-4-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
CAR |
|
|
NO |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 10/26/2003 |
CAR 23 |
NO 20 |
368 |
223 |
145 |
294 |
104 |
190 |
| 10/5/2003 |
NO 13 |
CAR 19 |
309 |
185 |
124 |
344 |
155 |
189 |
| 12/29/2002 |
CAR 10 |
NO 6 |
273 |
85 |
188 |
244 |
125 |
119 |
| 11/10/2002 |
NO 34 |
CAR 24 |
396 |
100 |
296 |
345 |
97 |
248 |
| 12/2/2001 |
CAR 23 |
NO 27 |
150 |
49 |
101 |
432 |
125 |
307 |
| 10/14/2001 |
NO 27 |
CAR 25 |
218 |
34 |
184 |
358 |
198 |
160 |
Commentary
Carolina has made a little bit of charge over the last few weeks. I wouldn’t have believed that 4-7 football teams would be in the middle of the playoff chase (one game out), but that’s how weak the NFC is this year. Both of these teams have something to play for and Carolina has shown that they haven’t taken a powder yet this season.
Carolina has won three games in a row and have gotten their running game going, but it’s come against some pretty weak opposition. They were life and death with San Francisco, caught the Cardinals making a quarterback change and they didn’t show up, and the Panthers got lucky to beat the Buc’s after giving up over 300 passing yards to Brian Griese.
New Orleans has plenty of weapons on offense. Aaron Brooks isn’t the best quarterback in the NFL, he can play well at times, and at other times he looks like a rookie. The Saints have a good receiving corps (if they can catch the ball) and a better running game than the Panthers.
I don’t like any Saints game because I can never predict when they are going to show up. I think the talent is on the side of New Orleans but I don’t know if that’s going to come through. Oh, what the heck, give me the Saints.
KANSAS CITY AT OAKLAND
Vegas Line
No line
Predicted Outcome
OAK 24 KC 21
Records
KC
SU (3-8-0)
ATS (3-8-0), ATS AWAY (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (6-5-0), O/U AWAY (3-2-0)
OAK
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS HOME (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (7-4-0), O/U HOME (2-3-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
KC |
|
|
OAK |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 11/23/2003 |
OAK 24 |
KC 27 |
384 |
142 |
242 |
379 |
166 |
213 |
| 10/20/2003 |
KC 17 |
OAK 10 |
319 |
125 |
194 |
357 |
100 |
257 |
| 12/28/2002 |
KC 0 |
OAK 24 |
176 |
44 |
132 |
354 |
280 |
74 |
| 10/27/2002 |
OAK 10 |
KC 20 |
323 |
133 |
190 |
417 |
83 |
334 |
| 12/9/2001 |
KC 26 |
OAK 28 |
447 |
204 |
243 |
264 |
79 |
185 |
| 9/9/2001 |
OAK 27 |
KC 24 |
254 |
35 |
219 |
427 |
100 |
327 |
Commentary
The Chiefs defense has given up at 27 points in each of its last five games and that’s a big concern with a veteran team that may quit down the stretch. KC hasn’t won the turnover battle once since their first game with Denver and their ball control offense that can march up and down the field has not been able to translate that yardage into points the last four games. The Chiefs have been in each of those contests but have found a way to lose each game.
I’m not sure what’s more demoralizing to a veteran team, getting blown out or watching as you piss away another game. My guess is that this team isn’t believing in the magic any more and you may see KC fade down the stretch as they realize their Super Bowl hopes are gone for another year.
Oakland , on the other hand, showed in snowy Denver that they haven’t quit. They came from two touchdowns down in bad conditions in a noisy, hostile stadium. That showed me something. Oakland has no running game, but they’ve found a way to win. My concern is that the Raiders were pointing that Denver game and don’t have anything left in the tank. Not a game I’m looking to go to the window on.
DENVER AT SAN DIEGO
Vegas Line
SD -3 Total 47.5
Predicted Outcome
SD 27 DEN 17
Records
DEN
SU (7-4-0)
ATS (4-5-2), ATS AWAY (2-2-1)
OVER/UNDER (3-6-2), O/U AWAY (0-5-0)
SD
SU (8-3-0)
ATS (9-1-1), ATS HOME (4-1-0)
OVER/UNDER (7-4-0), O/U HOME (5-0-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
DEN |
|
|
SD |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 9/26/2004 |
SD 13 |
DEN 23 |
328 |
37 |
291 |
214 |
85 |
129 |
| 11/16/2003 |
SD 8 |
DEN 37 |
448 |
201 |
247 |
96 |
40 |
56 |
| 9/14/2003 |
DEN 37 |
SD 13 |
382 |
197 |
185 |
303 |
121 |
182 |
| 12/1/2002 |
DEN 27 |
SD 30 |
417 |
156 |
261 |
434 |
220 |
214 |
| 10/6/2002 |
SD 9 |
DEN 26 |
417 |
117 |
300 |
314 |
79 |
235 |
| 11/11/2001 |
SD 16 |
DEN 26 |
338 |
127 |
211 |
243 |
96 |
147 |
| 10/21/2001 |
DEN 10 |
SD 27 |
263 |
81 |
182 |
379 |
107 |
272 |
Commentary
Gee. The Chargers are 9-1-1 ATS this season, eight straight covers, and I don’t think anyone could have seen that coming back in summer. You could have gotten Drew Brees as a free agent of your fantasy team for nothing and now this guy is looking at getting a big paycheck this off-season.
I’m asking myself if I would rather at this point have Drew Brees or Jake Plummer? After some thought, I’d rather have Brees. Plummer is the better talent, but somewhere in the game, he makes the dumb play.
The reason I’m asking myself that question is that both these teams are very similar. Both the Chargers and the Broncos feature the power running game and both teams try and stop the opposing running game and make the enemy quarterback beat you. This game is going to come down to which quarterback plays better. In the game earlier this year, it was Plummer that made more of the long throws that eventually led to a 23-13 victory at home. This time I think it’s Brees that makes the big play in what should be a low-scoring game. I like under the total better than any side, but give me the Chargers here.
N.Y. GIANTS AT WASHINGTON
Vegas Line
WAS -2.5 Total 35
Predicted Outcome
WAS 24 NYG 13
Records
NYG
SU (5-6-0)
ATS (5-6-0), ATS AWAY (3-2-0)
OVER/UNDER (3-8-0), O/U AWAY (1-4-0)
WAS
SU (3-8-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS HOME (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (2-9-0), O/U HOME (2-3-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
NYG |
|
|
WAS |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 9/19/2004 |
WAS 14 |
NYG 20 |
277 |
62 |
215 |
322 |
108 |
214 |
| 12/7/2003 |
WAS 20 |
NYG 7 |
220 |
120 |
100 |
288 |
150 |
138 |
| 9/21/2003 |
NYG 24 |
WAS 21 |
399 |
129 |
270 |
456 |
124 |
332 |
| 12/8/2002 |
NYG 27 |
WAS 21 |
316 |
111 |
205 |
447 |
132 |
315 |
| 11/17/2002 |
WAS 17 |
NYG 19 |
299 |
88 |
211 |
166 |
60 |
106 |
| 10/28/2001 |
NYG 21 |
WAS 35 |
388 |
42 |
346 |
353 |
157 |
196 |
| 10/7/2001 |
WAS 9 |
NYG 23 |
309 |
142 |
167 |
181 |
57 |
124 |
Commentary
Just when you’ve had enough bad football, you get another serving here. Eli Manning (6 of 21 and two interceptions last week) makes his first road trip ever and his first to Washington to face an ultra active defense that stuffs the run. If RB Tiki Barber isn’t a factor and the Giants have to rely on Manning’s arm to move the team, New York is in big trouble.
Looking at the statistics, QB Patrick Ramsey has had decent games the last two weeks, on the road at Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. I think the Redskins will actually score some points and should get a comfortable win.
GREEN BAY AT PHILADELPHIA
Vegas Line
PHI -6.5 Total 47
Predicted Outcome
PHI 31 GB 24
Records
GB
SU (7-4-0)
ATS (5-6-0), ATS AWAY (3-2-0)
OVER/UNDER (7-4-0), O/U AWAY (3-2-0)
PHI
SU (10-1-0)
ATS (8-3-0), ATS HOME (4-1-0)
OVER/UNDER (3-8-0), O/U HOME (4-1-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
GB |
|
|
PHI |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 1/11/2004 |
GB 17 |
PHI 20 |
381 |
210 |
171 |
363 |
164 |
199 |
| 11/10/2003 |
PHI 17 |
GB 14 |
307 |
241 |
66 |
282 |
92 |
190 |
Commentary
This looks like a big over game to me. Both offenses are playing well and their defenses are not. Philadelphia’s defense gives up way too many rushing yards and Packers in their six straight wins have been unstoppable at times. Green Bay’s offensive line should be able to open up holes for a rested Ahman Green. As you saw on Monday night, when Green Bay is balanced on offense, can run the ball for over 100 yards, they don’t have to have QB Bret Favre throw for 300 yards and he doesn’t throw that big interception.
The Packers defense still doesn’t inspire any confidence, however. They gave up more than 400 passing yards to QB Marc Bulger and the Rams so the Eagles dynamic duo of McNabb and Terrell Owens should hook up for a couple touchdowns. The Packers didn’t get any pressure on Bulger without blitzing and I don’t think they will generate a pass rush against the Eagle with their front four either. If Green Bay blitzes, Owens will light them up down the field. If the Packers don’t blitz, then McNabb can sit back and pick them apart.
I don’t like laying nearly a touchdown against the Packers with Green Bay playing so well, so I’m not willing to play either if they can’t play defense. I also don’t trust the Packers not to finally hit a speed bump and have an off week. As I said, I think the over is the play, but Green Bay has value if you can get a touchdown.
PITTSBURGH AT JACKSONVILLE
Vegas Line
PIT -4 Total 35.5
Predicted Outcome
JAX 16 PIT 14
Records
PIT
SU (10-1-0)
ATS (7-3-1), ATS AWAY (3-1-1)
OVER/UNDER (6-5-0), O/U AWAY (2-3-0)
JAX
SU (6-5-0)
ATS (6-5-0), ATS HOME (3-2-0)
OVER/UNDER (3-8-0), O/U HOME (1-4-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
PIT |
|
|
JAX |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 12/1/2002 |
PIT 25 |
JAC 23 |
403 |
219 |
184 |
226 |
102 |
124 |
| 11/18/2001 |
JAC 7 |
PIT 20 |
402 |
145 |
257 |
234 |
48 |
186 |
| 9/9/2001 |
PIT 3 |
JAC 21 |
281 |
120 |
161 |
299 |
101 |
198 |
Commentary
An interesting game. Jacksonville’s defense is very strong between the tackles where the Steelers like to run. The Jaguars two big defensive tackles just absorb blocks allowing Jacksonville’s linebackers to flow to the ball and make plays. Pittsburgh’s power running game focuses on hitting defenses between the tackles and forcing opposing linebackers to step up into the hole and take on a 300 lb lineman. I’m not sure either side can impose their will in what could be a stalemate on the line of scrimmage.
If Pittsburgh cannot grind out first downs and has to depend on rookie QB Ben Rothlisburger to move the football, there could be an upset here. Jacksonville has a little more versatility on offense and can keep the Steelers defense off balance enough that Blitzburgh cannot load up and come after the passer.
I see this as a low-scoring field goal kind of game where the team that makes the least amount of mistakes wins the football game. An under seems the play here as both teams have a good shot at winning the game but neither team should be able to put together 10 play drives.
DALLAS AT SEATTLE
Vegas Line
SEA -8.5 TOTAL 42
Predicted Outcome
SEA 21 DAL 17
Records
DAL
SU (4-7-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS AWAY (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (7-4-0), O/U AWAY (4-1-0)
SEA
SU (6-5-0)
ATS (4-7-0), ATS HOME (1-4-0)
OVER/UNDER (7-4-0), O/U HOME (4-1-0)
Recent Meetings
| |
|
|
|
DAL |
|
|
SEA |
|
| Date |
Away |
Home |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
TOTAL |
RUSH |
PASS |
| 10/27/2002 |
SEA 17 |
DAL 14 |
237 |
105 |
132 |
267 |
97 |
170 |
| 12/16/2001 |
DAL 3 |
SEA 29 |
218 |
102 |
116 |
312 |
173 |
139 |
Commentary
If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a million times,..I’m not laying more than a field goal with the Seahawks again this year. I must be in the minority as money keeps coming in on the sea bags despite the fact that they covered slightly more than half the games they’ve not covered. That astounds me because if you’ve watched this team play, and especially if you watched last week’s debacle, laying a touchdown should be the last thing on your mind and laying 8.5 should win you a referral to Gamblers Anonymous. For God’s sake, this is the same Seahawks team that lost to Drew Bledsoe and the Bills 38-9 last week and now you’re standing in line at the window to lay points? You have to be kidding me.
The Cowboys and the Bears won this year’s award for the biggest turkey; god that was an awful game. The Drew Henson quarterback experiment lasted a half as Bill Parcells yanked him at intermission and inserted Vinny Testaverde and the team responded with a victory. Dallas, despite their struggles, are right in the thick of the playoff hunt and I don’t expect Parcells to put Henson in another game until the Cowboys are eliminated from the post season…and that’s okay by me, I’ve seen enough bad football already this season.
Some way, somehow Dallas keeps this game within a touchdown. It may take the Seahawks receivers dropping a half dozen balls given how badly the Cowboys secondary has played, but I have every confidence they can do it. Give me the Cowboys.
College Thoughts
Army/Navy (over)
Michigan St/Hawaii (over)
Miami FLA -7
USC/UCLA over 58
Colorado +21.5
Louisville/Tulane over 72
|