Placekickers have longed carried the reputation for being hard to predict and it ends up as being quite true - with a few notable exceptions. All player listings to follow were created using the standard performance scoring as seen on The Huddle statistics. Kickers receive one point per extra point and three points per field goal.
| |
2001 |
Pts |
2002 |
Pts |
2003 |
Pts |
2004 |
Pts |
2005 |
Pts |
| 1 |
J Wilkins |
127 |
J Feely |
138 |
J Wilkins |
163 |
A Vinatieri |
141 |
J Feely |
148 |
| 2 |
M Vanderjagt |
125 |
D Akers |
133 |
M Vanderjagt |
157 |
J Elam |
129 |
N Rackers |
140 |
| 3 |
J Elam |
124 |
J Carney |
130 |
M Stover |
134 |
J Reed |
124 |
S Graham |
131 |
| 4 |
K Brown |
124 |
R Longwell |
128 |
J Kasay |
125 |
D Akers |
122 |
L Tynes |
125 |
| 5 |
M Stover |
115 |
M Gramatica |
128 |
G Anderson |
123 |
S Graham |
122 |
J Kasay |
121 |
| 6 |
D Akers |
115 |
S Janikowski |
128 |
J Elam |
120 |
R Longwell |
120 |
M Vanderjagt |
121 |
| |
| 7 |
J Feely |
115 |
J Elam |
120 |
R Longwell |
120 |
M Vanderjagt |
119 |
J Wilkins |
117 |
| 8 |
J Carney |
113 |
M Andersen |
117 |
D Akers |
114 |
R Lindell |
117 |
J Reed |
117 |
| 9 |
A Vinatieri |
113 |
A Vinatieri |
117 |
J Brown |
114 |
M Stover |
117 |
J Elam |
115 |
| 10 |
P Edinger |
112 |
M Hollis |
115 |
A Vinatieri |
112 |
N Kaeding |
114 |
M Stover |
113 |
| 11 |
S Janikowski |
111 |
O Mare |
114 |
M Andersen |
106 |
L Tynes |
109 |
R Lindell |
113 |
| 12 |
T Peterson |
108 |
J Nedney |
111 |
S Graham |
106 |
J Brown |
109 |
N Kaeding |
112 |
| |
| 13 |
J Hall |
104 |
M Bryant |
108 |
D Brien |
105 |
S Janikowski |
106 |
J Brown |
110 |
| 14 |
R Longwell |
104 |
J Hall |
107 |
P Edinger |
105 |
D Brien |
105 |
O Mare |
108 |
| 15 |
J Cortez |
101 |
R Lindell |
107 |
A Elling |
102 |
J Carney |
104 |
J Scobee |
107 |
| 16 |
B Conway |
100 |
J Cortez |
103 |
J Carney |
102 |
P Dawson |
100 |
P Edinger |
106 |
| 17 |
M Andersen |
98 |
M Vanderjagt |
103 |
J Hall |
101 |
J Hanson |
100 |
T Peterson |
104 |
| 18 |
M Gramatica |
97 |
J Hanson |
100 |
J Reed |
100 |
M Andersen |
99 |
K Brown |
102 |
| 19 |
O Mare |
96 |
P Dawson |
100 |
B Cundiff |
99 |
S Christie |
99 |
A Vinatieri |
100 |
| 20 |
P Dawson |
95 |
M Stover |
96 |
O Mare |
99 |
J Feely |
94 |
P Dawson |
100 |
| 21 |
J Nedney |
94 |
P Edinger |
95 |
S Janikowski |
94 |
N Rackers |
94 |
R Bironas |
99 |
| 22 |
R Lindell |
93 |
J Wilkins |
94 |
J Hanson |
92 |
J Scobee |
93 |
J Nedney |
97 |
| 23 |
J Kasay |
91 |
G Anderson |
90 |
S Marler |
90 |
B Cundiff |
91 |
J Carney |
97 |
| 24 |
W Richey |
89 |
S Christie |
89 |
J Feely |
89 |
J Wilkins |
89 |
M Bryant |
94 |
| The Following season: |
Remained Top 6 |
Became 7-12 |
Not in Top 12 |
|
| Top 6 became |
Avg. |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
| Top 6 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 7 to 12 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Worse than 12th |
3 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
| 7 to 12 became |
Avg. |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
| Top 6 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
| 7 to 12 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Worse than 12th |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Top 6 was |
Avg. |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
| Top 6 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 7 to 12 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
| Worse than 12th |
3 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
The Top 6 each year is closest to being a guide for who will not be in the Top 6 the following year. Not once in the last five years has more than one kicker repeated in the Top 6 the following year. 2002 had none.
The 7 to 12 range kickers actually fared better at becoming Top 6 than those kickers who just were Top 6. They have been twice as likely and last year were four times as likely to show up in the top tier in 2004 though they fell back to just two last year. However - they had their share of duds as well. Overall, this is the best tier for repeating.
Looking backwards, there's still not a lot to glean that can be relied on. Even if you selected two kickers from the previous Top 12, you'd be lucky to get one of them that remained in the Top 12. One caveat to all of this is that those bad kickers - ranked 24+ in the previous season - can pretty much be ignored the next year safely enough. They just do not rise up enough to warrant any consideration.
Another oddity is how many kickers alternate having big years and down years. There is no real reason for it other than it only takes about 20 points to shift a kicker from being Top 6 to being nothing more than a back-up.
| |
Repeat Reliability |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
| 1 |
J Elam |
7 |
6 |
2 |
7 |
| 2 |
S Graham |
|
12 |
5 |
3 |
| 3 |
L Tynes |
|
|
11 |
4 |
| 4 |
M Vanderjagt |
17 |
2 |
7 |
5 |
| 5 |
A Vinatieri |
9 |
10 |
1 |
16 |
| 6 |
J Reed |
|
18 |
3 |
6 |
| 7 |
D Akers |
2 |
8 |
4 |
23 |
| 8 |
R Longwell |
4 |
7 |
6 |
20 |
| 9 |
N Kaeding |
|
|
10 |
9 |
| 10 |
M Stover |
20 |
3 |
9 |
8 |
| 11 |
J Brown |
|
9 |
12 |
10 |
| 12 |
J Feely |
1 |
24 |
20 |
1 |
| 13 |
N Rackers |
|
|
21 |
2 |
| 14 |
J Kasay |
|
4 |
27 |
5 |
| 15 |
J Carney |
3 |
16 |
15 |
18 |
| 16 |
J Wilkins |
22 |
1 |
24 |
6 |
| 17 |
S Janikowski |
6 |
21 |
13 |
20 |
| 18 |
J Nedney |
12 |
|
|
18 |
| 19 |
R Lindell |
15 |
28 |
8 |
11 |
| 20 |
P Dawson |
19 |
|
16 |
16 |
| 21 |
J Scobee |
|
|
22 |
12 |
| 22 |
O Mare |
11 |
20 |
30 |
11 |
| 23 |
P Edinger |
21 |
14 |
29 |
13 |
| 24 |
J Hanson |
18 |
22 |
17 |
21 |
The table to the right shows the year end ranking for each of the listed players and is sorted in a manner to suggest the most reliable "repeaters" in fantasy drafts over the last five years. While Akers has not been a #1 before and he's only once been better than 4th in a given year, he was the most reliable - until last year. Same for Longwell. Vanderjagt and Wilkins have been gold in the past but both have been every other year players.
Notable too is that the #1 kicker for the last four years has not repeated with a performance better than 16th the next year.
Kicker Repeatability
12% - 0%
Considering the similar scoring for all kickers, only the Top 6 really can be said to be difference makers. Over the last five years, there is usually only one player that repeats the next year in the Top 6 and yet that tier is almost entirely unrelaible. There is just no measurable way to predict kickers based heavily on past performance. Akers, Longwell, Elam, Vanderjagt, Stover and Vinatieri are the only "repeaters" worthy of relying on and as shown above - that repeat may mean that they are just worth having as a starting kicker, not as a true difference maker. Playing into the numbers as well are many kickers that turn in one or two monster games that pushes them well above the pack and yet the next year doesn't have those one or two games and makes them look like they dropped severely. The reality is that they are pretty much the same as always other than the one or two games. |