2008 Fantasy Points Allowed Opposing Rushers
| Good |
Allow |
Avg |
Allow |
Bad |
Allow |
| KC |
31.4 |
ATL |
17.3 |
DAL |
12.1 |
| STL |
23.6 |
GB |
17.2 |
CAR |
12.1 |
| DEN |
22.9 |
SEA |
15.1 |
ARI |
11.6 |
| DET |
21.7 |
SD |
14.8 |
MIN |
11.5 |
| IND |
21.4 |
CHI |
14.3 |
PHI |
10.6 |
| CIN |
19.9 |
JAC |
14.2 |
NYG |
10.2 |
| OAK |
20.5 |
NE |
14.0 |
WAS |
9.7 |
| CLE |
19.3 |
BUF |
13.5 |
PIT |
8.3 |
| HOU |
18.9 |
NO |
13.1 |
TB |
7.7 |
| SF |
18.3 |
MIA |
12.6 |
BAL |
6.4 |
| |
Good |
TEN |
12.6 |
|
Bad |
| |
Match-up |
NYJ |
12.5 |
|
Match-up |
Using the actual results from weeks 1 through 8 of lthis season, the schedule was compared against the top 10 and worst 10 defenses for allowing fantasy points to running backs for rushing yards and scores.
The table to the right shows the fantasy points allowed to opposing teams for all running backs in that game and are the actual results.
A "Good" game was when the team faced an opposing defense that was in the top 10 for allowing fantasy points. A "Bad" game was when that team faced an opposing defense that was in the ten defenses that allowed the least amount of fantasy points.The "EOS" is the Ease of Schedule - simply the net result of good minus bad games.
These rankings are skewed by even one very good or very bad game, so use some wisdom in addition to considering the results. As with all such reviews, the most important findings are the extremes as they will change less as the season progresses and it is generally more important to not face a tough ("bad") defense than it is to go against an easy defense ("good"). Most of your starters are going to be among the best at their postion, so the biggest question is if they will be limited by opposing defenses.
Three different views are given below - Weeks 9 to 12 show what players will face during the next month. Weeks 9 through 16 are shown for a full season view and weeks 14 to 16 show the most common weeks for fantasy playoffs. Below that is the NFL schedule marked for each team to show when they have good (green) or bad (red) match-ups.
| Weeks 9 to 12 |
Weeks 9 to 16 |
Weeks 14 to 16 (FF Playoffs) |
|
EOS |
Good |
Bad |
|
EOS |
Good |
Bad |
|
EOS |
Good |
Bad |
| BUF |
2 |
2 |
0 |
MIA |
5 |
5 |
0 |
IND |
2 |
2 |
0 |
| CHI |
2 |
2 |
0 |
BUF |
4 |
4 |
0 |
MIA |
2 |
2 |
0 |
| DEN |
2 |
2 |
0 |
NYJ |
3 |
3 |
0 |
BUF |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| MIA |
2 |
2 |
0 |
HOU |
3 |
4 |
1 |
GB |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| HOU |
2 |
3 |
1 |
IND |
3 |
4 |
1 |
HOU |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| NE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
JAX |
3 |
4 |
1 |
JAX |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| NYJ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
DEN |
2 |
3 |
1 |
KC |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| ARZ |
1 |
2 |
1 |
OAK |
2 |
3 |
1 |
NO |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| ATL |
1 |
2 |
1 |
TEN |
2 |
3 |
1 |
NYJ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| CAR |
1 |
2 |
1 |
CLE |
2 |
4 |
2 |
OAK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| CLE |
1 |
2 |
1 |
CHI |
1 |
2 |
1 |
SEA |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| JAX |
1 |
2 |
1 |
KC |
1 |
2 |
1 |
SF |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| PIT |
1 |
2 |
1 |
SD |
1 |
4 |
3 |
CIN |
1 |
2 |
1 |
| TEN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
ATL |
0 |
2 |
2 |
SD |
1 |
2 |
1 |
| IND |
0 |
1 |
1 |
MIN |
0 |
2 |
2 |
TEN |
1 |
2 |
1 |
| MIN |
0 |
1 |
1 |
NE |
0 |
2 |
2 |
CHI |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| NO |
0 |
1 |
1 |
NO |
0 |
2 |
2 |
ARZ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| OAK |
0 |
1 |
1 |
STL |
0 |
2 |
2 |
CLE |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| STL |
0 |
1 |
1 |
ARZ |
0 |
3 |
3 |
DEN |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| SD |
0 |
2 |
2 |
CAR |
0 |
3 |
3 |
DET |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| TB |
0 |
2 |
2 |
GB |
-1 |
1 |
2 |
MIN |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| GB |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
PIT |
-1 |
2 |
3 |
NE |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| KC |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
SF |
-1 |
2 |
3 |
STL |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| CIN |
-1 |
1 |
2 |
TB |
-1 |
2 |
3 |
ATL |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
| PHI |
-1 |
1 |
2 |
CIN |
-1 |
3 |
4 |
TB |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
| DET |
-2 |
0 |
2 |
DET |
-2 |
1 |
3 |
CAR |
-1 |
1 |
2 |
| BAL |
-2 |
1 |
3 |
SEA |
-3 |
1 |
4 |
PHI |
-1 |
1 |
2 |
| DAL |
-2 |
1 |
3 |
PHI |
-3 |
2 |
5 |
WAS |
-1 |
1 |
2 |
| SF |
-2 |
1 |
3 |
BAL |
-4 |
2 |
6 |
PIT |
-2 |
0 |
2 |
| SEA |
-3 |
0 |
3 |
DAL |
-5 |
1 |
6 |
BAL |
-3 |
0 |
3 |
| WAS |
-3 |
0 |
3 |
WAS |
-5 |
1 |
6 |
DAL |
-3 |
0 |
3 |
| NYG |
-4 |
0 |
4 |
NYG |
-8 |
0 |
8 |
NYG |
-3 |
0 |
3 |
Week - By - Week
| |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
| ARI |
@STL |
SF |
@SEA |
NYG |
@PHI |
STL |
MIN |
@NE |
| ATL |
@OAK |
NO |
DEN |
CAR |
@SD |
@NO |
TB |
@MIN |
| BAL |
@CLE |
@HOU |
@NYG |
PHI |
@CIN |
WAS |
PIT |
@DAL |
| BUF |
NYJ |
@NE |
CLE |
@KC |
SF |
MIA |
@NYJ |
@DEN |
| CAR |
BYE |
@OAK |
DET |
@ATL |
@GB |
TB |
DEN |
@NYG |
| CHI |
DET |
TEN |
@GB |
@STL |
@MIN |
JAC |
NO |
GB |
| CIN |
JAC |
BYE |
PHI |
@PIT |
BAL |
@IND |
WAS |
@CLE |
| CLE |
BAL |
DEN |
@BUF |
HOU |
IND |
@TEN |
@PHI |
CIN |
| DAL |
@NYG |
BYE |
@WAS |
SF |
SEA |
@PIT |
NYG |
BAL |
| DEN |
MIA |
@CLE |
@ATL |
OAK |
@NYJ |
KC |
@CAR |
BUF |
| DET |
@CHI |
JAC |
@CAR |
TB |
TEN |
MIN |
@IND |
NO |
| GB |
@TEN |
@MIN |
CHI |
@NO |
CAR |
HOU |
@JAC |
@CHI |
| HOU |
@MIN |
BAL |
@IND |
@CLE |
JAC |
@GB |
TEN |
@OAK |
| IND |
NE |
@PIT |
HOU |
@SD |
@CLE |
CIN |
DET |
@JAC |
| JAC |
@CIN |
@DET |
TEN |
MIN |
@HOU |
@CHI |
GB |
IND |
| KC |
TB |
@SD |
NO |
BUF |
@OAK |
@DEN |
SD |
MIA |
| MIA |
@DEN |
SEA |
OAK |
NE |
@STL |
@BUF |
SF |
@KC |
| MIN |
HOU |
GB |
@TB |
@JAC |
CHI |
@DET |
@ARI |
ATL |
| NE |
@IND |
BUF |
NYJ |
@MIA |
PIT |
@SEA |
@OAK |
ARI |
| NO |
BYE |
@ATL |
@KC |
GB |
@TB |
ATL |
@CHI |
@DET |
| NYG |
DAL |
@PHI |
BAL |
@ARI |
@WAS |
PHI |
@DAL |
CAR |
| NYJ |
@BUF |
STL |
@NE |
@TEN |
DEN |
@SF |
BUF |
@SEA |
| OAK |
ATL |
CAR |
@MIA |
@DEN |
KC |
@SD |
NE |
HOU |
| PHI |
@SEA |
NYG |
@CIN |
@BAL |
ARI |
@NYG |
CLE |
@WAS |
| PIT |
@WAS |
IND |
SD |
CIN |
@NE |
DAL |
@BAL |
@TEN |
| SD |
BYE |
KC |
@PIT |
IND |
ATL |
OAK |
@KC |
@TB |
| SEA |
PHI |
@MIA |
ARI |
WAS |
@DAL |
NE |
@STL |
NYJ |
| SF |
BYE |
@ARI |
STL |
@DAL |
@BUF |
NYJ |
@MIA |
@STL |
| STL |
ARI |
@NYJ |
@SF |
CHI |
MIA |
@ARI |
SEA |
SF |
| TB |
@KC |
BYE |
MIN |
@DET |
NO |
@CAR |
@ATL |
SD |
| TEN |
GB |
@CHI |
@JAC |
NYJ |
@DET |
CLE |
@HOU |
PIT |
| WAS |
PIT |
BYE |
DAL |
@SEA |
NYG |
@BAL |
@CIN |
PHI |
|